How To Live Better Tiếng Việt

This book is written about mainland China. Where it says national, domestic or the state, it means China, not your country.

Search / Section 23

23 Which skills are worth learning

This section counts money and time. Item 2 also counts mortality. The first six items answer one question: whether to keep studying. Item 1 first says which stretch of the options the law crosses out. Item 2 counts the relation between schooling and length of life. Item 3 looks at which band of education people across the country are in. Item 4 covers what aid there is when you cannot afford to study. Item 5 covers what paths remain if you do not get into an ordinary high school. Item 6 turns "study or go to work" into a sum, and gives a method you can run yourself. The next seven items answer another question: once you have decided to learn something, how to pick it. Wage statistics in China split by trade are hard to check item by item from public official sources. So this section writes only the things whose source can be found: roughly how much more pay one more year of school brings (also called the return to education), how to check whether a certificate is lawful, where training subsidies come from, and which dimension to look at so a skill is harder to displace. This book does not give a figure for how much a particular trade earns in a month. Items 14 to 19 answer a third question: once you have settled what to learn, how to learn it in less time. Those six items count time. They are not converted into money. Items 20 to 23 answer a fourth question: if you are already doing professional or technical work, where to apply for a title, how the exam works, which pitfalls to avoid, and what getting the title is worth. Items 24 and 25 answer whether, on finishing a bachelor's or a master's, to go on to a master's or a doctorate. No Chinese income figures that take out personal differences were found, so what is cited is UK research.

The items are grouped by subject below. Item numbers are in parentheses.

Whether to keep studying: under 16 there is no going out to work (item 1), count whether schooling is useful inside mortality (item 2), the education structure of the whole country (item 3), if you cannot afford it, run the policy figures first (item 4), the path if you do not get into an ordinary high school (item 5), turn study or work into a sum (item 6).

What to learn and how to pick it: the return to one more year of education (item 7), check the occupational-qualification catalogue before an exam (item 8), take training through government subsidy channels (item 9), pick skills that need the hands and judgment on the spot (item 10), see whether a skill has a grade assessment (item 11), check the local catalogue of occupations in short supply (item 12), choose a short course that lets you start the job directly (item 13).

How to learn in less time: close the book and test yourself when you finish (item 14), spread the time over several days (item 15), do not treat highlighting as the main way to study (item 16), mix several kinds of problem (item 17), do not pick a method by visual type or auditory type (item 18), turn what you have to memorize into questions and test yourself (item 19).

Professional titles: find the channel for applying (item 20), the junior and intermediate accounting titles are a unified exam (item 21), do not hire an agent to get the title for you (item 22), holding the title is not the same as a pay rise (item 23).

Master's and doctorate: whether to go on to a master's after a bachelor's (item 24), whether to go on to a doctorate after a master's (item 25).

Items in this section (25)
  1. 23.1 Under 16 there is no "go to work" option: any employer who hires you is fined 5000 yuan a month, and anyone willing to hire you is breaking the law
  2. 23.2 Put "whether schooling is useful" into the mortality account as well: each extra year of education cuts adult death risk by about 1.9%
  3. 23.3 Before you judge whether "credentials have been devalued," look at the national education structure: only 15,467 people per 100000 have a college education (2020 census; 2025 sample estimate about 19%)
  4. 23.4 "Cannot afford it"? Run the policy figures first: public secondary vocational tuition is mostly already waived for rural and hard-up students, the grant is 2300 yuan, and student loans go up to 20,000 yuan a year
  5. 23.5 Failing to get into regular high school doesn’t mean your path ends: secondary vocational schools offer linked admission programs and separate exams, and public institutions (事业单位) can lower educational requirements when recruiting for skilled posts
  6. 23.6 Turn "study or go to work" into a sum: set the three years of wages you would earn by going to work now against the yearly income gap that more schooling would bring over the decades after
  7. 23.7 Keep this baseline in mind: on average worldwide, the private return to one more year of education (the part that lands on your own income) is about 9% a year
  8. 23.8 Before you spend money on a certificate, check whether it is on the National Vocational Qualification Catalogue or on the list of evaluation agencies filed with the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security
  9. 23.9 It’s best to use government subsidies for training — don’t jump straight to paying for commercial courses out of pocket
  10. 23.10 When picking a skill to learn, prioritize those that require hands-on work and on-the-spot judgment — these are the hardest for automation to replace
  11. 23.11 Check first whether a skill has an official grading system and if those grades can translate into pay raises
  12. 23.12 Do not treat "high wages online" as a shortage of workers; check the local catalogue of occupations in short supply and the subsidy catalogue
  13. 23.13 For the same cost and time, prioritize short-duration programs that lead directly to employment
  14. 23.14 When you finish studying, close the book and test yourself first; do not go back and reread
  15. 23.15 Spread the same time over several days; do not finish it in one sitting
  16. 23.16 Do not treat highlighting, rereading, and writing summaries as your main study methods
  17. 23.17 Mix several kinds of problems; do not do twenty of one kind in a row
  18. 23.18 Do not pick a study method by "I am a visual learner, he is an auditory learner"
  19. 23.19 For material you must memorize, test yourself with questions in the form you will use later; do not count a verbatim run-through as done
  20. 23.20 First, figure out which professional series and level you belong to, then find the right application channels based on your employer type
  21. 23.21 Junior and intermediate titles in fields such as accounting are earned by a national unified exam; first check education and years of work before you register
  22. 23.22 Do not hire an agent to get a title for you, do not buy ghostwritten papers, and do not fake materials: once verified the title is revoked and a 3-year integrity record is kept
  23. 23.23 Getting a professional title does not automatically mean a salary raise: first find out whether your employer uses a post-based quota system or if the title alone doesn’t guarantee a post or raise
  24. 23.24 Whether to go on to a master's after a bachelor's: first count the tuition and the two or three years of wages you will not earn, then see whether your own subject pays more; people already at work can do a part-time master's, with the same certificate force as full-time
  25. 23.25 Whether to go on to a doctorate after a master's: do it only if the job you want states that it requires a doctorate, and count the mental load before you start

23.1 Under 16 there is no "go to work" option: any employer who hires you is fined 5000 yuan a month, and anyone willing to hire you is breaking the law

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Freedom
Value: Very highEvidence A
In plain terms

Junior high usually ends at 15 to 16, right on this line. Under 16, except for special hiring by arts or sports units, hiring you is illegal, and the fine is 5000 yuan a month for each child worker used. So anyone willing to take you is an employer already breaking the law on hiring. If something really goes wrong, medical costs and compensation can only be claimed from that employer.

Cost

No money. Spend one minute working out how old you are.

Benefit

Article 11 of the Compulsory Education Law: "Parents or other legal guardians of every child who has reached the age of six shall send the child to school to receive and complete compulsory education." Article 14: "Employers are prohibited from hiring school-age children and adolescents who should be receiving compulsory education." Article 58: where, without proper reason, school-age children or adolescents are not sent to school as this law requires, the local township people's government or the education administrative department of the county-level people's government "gives criticism and education and orders correction within a time limit." Article 2 of the Provisions on the Prohibition of Child Labour: state organs, social organizations, enterprises, institutions, private non-enterprise units, and individual industrial and commercial households "shall not hire minors under 16." Article 6: "impose a fine of 5000 yuan per month for each child worker used"; if not corrected by the deadline, fine 10,000 yuan per person per month. Article 7: anyone who introduces a child into employment is fined "5000 yuan for each person introduced." Article 10: if a child worker falls ill or is injured, the employer "shall be responsible for sending them to a medical institution for treatment and shall bear all medical and living expenses during treatment"; for disability or death there is also a one-time compensation. Article 13 leaves only one exception: arts and sports units may, with the consent of a parent or other guardian, hire professional arts workers or athletes under 16 (nationwide)

Notes

The beneficiary is you. Working after turning 16 is lawful. If you want to learn a trade before working, run first through the dimensions in item 10 of this section (pick skills that resist automation). Overtime pay, annual leave, and work-injury benefits in Section 19 all assume a labor relationship and evidence. If a child worker is injured, under Article 10 of the Provisions on the Prohibition of Child Labour the employer bears all medical and living expenses during treatment, and for disability or death there is also a one-time compensation

Sources
  1. 全国人大常委会 (2018). 义务教育法(2018 年第二次修正,第十一、十四、五十八条). http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_zcfg/zcfg_jyfl/202110/t20211029_575949.html(教育部刊登)
  2. 国务院 (2002). 禁止使用童工规定(国务院令第 364 号,第二、六、七、十、十三条). http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2002/content_61798.htm

23.2 Put "whether schooling is useful" into the mortality account as well: each extra year of education cuts adult death risk by about 1.9%

  • Money No cost
  • Time Daily
  • Willpower A lot
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence ADisputed
In plain terms

Each extra year of school cuts the average risk of dying in adulthood by about 1.9%. It is clearest for people aged 18 to 49, about 2.9% lower per extra year; at 70 or older it is only 0.8% lower. People who keep studying often already had better circumstances, so how much is schooling itself cannot be pulled apart.

Cost

No money. What you spend is the time and energy of those extra years of school; for tuition see item 4 of this section (vocational-school tuition and grants). The hard part is staying with it and not quitting halfway.

Benefit

Prior studies were gathered and pooled (systematic review and meta-analysis). The search ran from January 1980 to May 2023; 603 studies were included in the end, from 70 sites in 59 countries, with 10355 observations. Education and adult mortality (deaths from all causes combined) follow a dose-response relation (more schooling, larger drop). Each extra year of education cuts death risk by 1.9% on average (95% uncertainty interval 1.8–2.0; the true value falls roughly in that band). For people aged 18 to 49 the drop is 2.9% per extra year (2.8–3.0). For people aged 70 or older the drop is 0.8% (0.6–1.0). No difference by sex was seen. Split by national development level (sociodemographic index), no difference was seen either

Notes

Disputed: The authors themselves reported publication bias (p<0.0001), meaning studies with nicer-looking results are more likely to be published. Results also differ widely across studies. All included work is follow-up observation, not trials that assign people to groups. Years of schooling are tangled with family circumstances, region, and occupation. Of this 1.9%, how much comes from schooling itself and how much from "people who can keep studying already had better circumstances" cannot be separated in this kind of study. Reverse causation cannot be separated either. People who were already ill or had mental problems as children are more likely to drop out and more likely to die early. That makes schooling look more useful than it is. So it strongly shows that "more schooling and living longer go the same way," but it does not equal "if you go to school you gain 1.9% more life." Benefit magnitude is set to small: what readers usually face is three or four more years; at 1.9% a year that adds up to under one tenth, which under this book's thresholds counts only as small. The beneficiary is you

Sources

IHME-CHAIN Collaborators (2024). Effects of education on adult mortality: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 9(3), e155-e165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00306-7

23.3 Before you judge whether "credentials have been devalued," look at the national education structure: only 15,467 people per 100000 have a college education (2020 census; 2025 sample estimate about 19%)

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence A
In plain terms

In the 2020 census, people nationwide who reached junior college or above were about 15%. The 2025 sample survey estimates about 19%, a few percentage points more in five years. In both, people with junior high were the largest group. People aged 15 and above averaged only 9.91 years of schooling, just past junior-high graduation. So a junior-high credential is the most common band in China, not a scarce one.

Cost

No money. Just look at the figures below.

Benefit

The reference date of the seventh national census was 1 November 2020. Among the national population, 218,360,767 people had a college education (junior college or above). High school (including secondary specialized school) 213005258. Junior high 487163489. Primary school 349658828. Compared with the sixth census in 2010, people with a college education per 100000 rose from 8930 to 15467. High school from 14032 to 15088. Junior high fell from 38788 to 34507. Primary school fell from 26779 to 24767. Average years of schooling for people aged 15 and above rose from 9.08 to 9.91. The illiteracy rate fell from 4.08% to 2.67%. The reference date of the 2025 national 1% population sample survey was 1 November 2025, with a sample of 20,520,000 people. From the sample the national population is estimated at 1405450000. Of these, college (junior college or above) 272330000, high school (including secondary specialized) 242720000, junior high 452830000, primary school 331220000. The bulletin does not give figures per 100000. Calculated ourselves from the headcounts and total population, college is about 19.4% and junior high about 32.2%, still the largest band

Notes

These figures only show how scarce a credential is in the population. Whether schooling pays for a particular person, run the method in item 6 of this section (how to weigh study against going to work). Also note: the census counts the whole national population, including the old and the young, not the labor force and not your age peers. The bulletin does not break the figures by age. From the rise of more than seven tenths in people with a college education per 100000 from 2010 to 2020, the share among young people is likely higher than the national figure; that is an inference. So comparing yourself with age peers using the national figure overstates your edge. What it can show is: in the national population, a college education is still a minority. The 2025 figures are a sample estimate; the census counts every household. The two use different bases, so both sets are shown side by side and the new figures do not replace the old. The 19.4% and 32.2% are calculated ourselves from the bulletin's headcounts and the total population. The beneficiary is you

Sources
  1. 国家统计局、国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室 (2021). 第七次全国人口普查公报(第六号)——人口受教育情况. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202302/t20230206_1902006.html
  2. 国家统计局 (2026). 2025 年全国 1% 人口抽样调查主要数据公报. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202605/t20260522_1963788.html

23.4 "Cannot afford it"? Run the policy figures first: public secondary vocational tuition is mostly already waived for rural and hard-up students, the grant is 2300 yuan, and student loans go up to 20,000 yuan a year

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Money
Value: Very highEvidence A
In plain terms

At public secondary vocational schools, rural students, urban students in agriculture-related majors, and students from hard-up families already have tuition waived. Grants for secondary vocational and ordinary high school are 2300 yuan a year from spring 2025. At university, the grant is 3700 yuan a year, and student loans can go up to 20,000 yuan a year. When money is short, run these figures first, then decide whether to quit and go to work.

Cost

Zero out-of-pocket expense. Before school starts, simply visit the school’s student-aid office and submit the required paperwork.

Benefit

The tuition-waiver policy for public secondary vocational schools has been in place since fall 2012; it covers all full-time first-, second-, and third-year students who are rural (including those in county towns), enrolled in agriculture-related programs, or from financially disadvantaged families (except for students in performing-arts majors). In 2024 the student-aid framework was updated: the national grant for undergraduate and junior-college students rose from 3300 to 3700 yuan per year, and the National Inspirational Scholarship increased from 5000 to 6000 yuan, both effective fall 2024 (the Inspirational Scholarship from 2024). For secondary vocational and regular high-school students, the grant also rose from 2000 to 2300 yuan per year, effective spring 2025. Student loans were adjusted as well: from fall 2024 undergraduate and junior-college students may borrow up to 20,000 yuan per year (previously 16000) and graduate students up to 25,000 yuan (previously 20000). The interest rate equals the applicable LPR minus 70 basis points (another 0.7 percentage points lower) (nationwide).

Notes

The beneficiaries are you and your children. Exactly which groups qualify for tuition waivers and how many grant tiers exist is determined by each province. Private schools receive subsidies based on the local public-school standard for the same kind of major, but any shortfall must still be paid by the student, so check against local documents before enrolling. Student loans are loans, not grants, and must be repaid after graduation; but they split "I cannot pay tuition now" from "are these years worth it" into two questions, so do not treat being short of money as the conclusion yet. Section 7 discusses training subsidies and emergency aid for periods of unemployment; families facing sudden income loss should apply for those programs first.

Sources
  1. 财政部、发展改革委、教育部、人力资源社会保障部 (2012). 关于扩大中等职业教育免学费政策范围 进一步完善国家助学金制度的意见(财教〔2012〕376 号). http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2013/content_2332779.htm
  2. 财政部、教育部、人力资源社会保障部有关司局负责人 (2024). 就调整学生资助政策有关问题答记者问. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202410/content_6983672.htm
  3. 财政部、教育部、人民银行、金融监管总局 (2024). 关于调整完善国家助学贷款有关政策的通知(财教〔2024〕188 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202411/content_6984812.htm

23.5 Failing to get into regular high school doesn’t mean your path ends: secondary vocational schools offer linked admission programs and separate exams, and public institutions (事业单位) can lower educational requirements when recruiting for skilled posts

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence A
In plain terms

The Vocational Education Law enacted in 2022 explicitly states that vocational education holds equal status to general education. Secondary vocational schools can enroll students through linked admission programs with higher vocational institutions, which in turn must reserve a set proportion of their enrollment slots or hold separate exams specifically for secondary vocational graduates. Employers are also prohibited from setting eligibility barriers based on a candidate’s vocational school background. Failing to meet the cutoff for regular high school admission simply means you get to choose a different path — it does not leave you stuck with a junior high school diploma.

Cost

No cost at all. Before submitting your high school entrance exam applications, check your province’s official vocational education admissions platform once.

Benefit

Article 3 of the Vocational Education Law (effective 1 May 2022) stipulates: “Vocational education is an educational type that holds equal importance to general education.” Article 37 states that secondary vocational schools “may, in accordance with relevant national regulations, implement linked admission and training programs with higher vocational education for designated majors.” Higher vocational institutions “may, in accordance with relevant national regulations, admit students via assessment methods that combine academic ability and vocational skills.” Provincial-level and above education authorities are required to build unified vocational education admissions platforms to publish information on schools, majors and enrollment quotas, and provide application query services. Article 53 further specifies: “Students from vocational schools enjoy equal opportunities as students from regular schools at the same level in terms of further education, employment and career development.” Higher vocational institutions and regular universities offering vocational education “must reserve a corresponding proportion of their enrollment quotas or hold separate exams to admit vocational school graduates specifically.” It is also forbidden for employers to set application, hiring or employment criteria that prevent vocational school graduates from competing on an equal footing. For positions requiring specific vocational skill certifications in public institution recruitment, “educational requirements can be appropriately lowered” nationwide.

Notes

These benefits apply to both yourself and your children. All the channels outlined here are legally mandated, but they do not guarantee admission. The specific majors covered by linked training programs, the exact proportion of slots reserved for separate admissions, and the exact subjects tested in vocational college entrance exams are all determined by each individual province. Before submitting applications, you must check your province’s current vocational education admissions platform and enrollment quotas — do not rely on rules or practices from other provinces. When selecting a secondary vocational major, use the criteria outlined in item 10 (choosing skills that are less prone to automation) as a reference: majors that require on-site work in non-standard environments are less likely to be phased out. To pick a school, confirm it is listed in your province’s current vocational education enrollment plan. Verify any certificates issued by the school using the three-step process described in item 8 (checking whether a certificate is on the official approved list). Avoid any recruitment materials that make promises like “guaranteed job placement” or “guaranteed pass.”

Sources

全国人大常委会 (2022). 职业教育法(2022 年修订,第三、三十七、五十三条). http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_zcfg/zcfg_jyfl/202204/t20220421_620064.html(教育部刊登)

23.6 Turn "study or go to work" into a sum: set the three years of wages you would earn by going to work now against the yearly income gap that more schooling would bring over the decades after

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence B
In plain terms

Going to work now earns you several years of wages sooner, but that money is received only once. Staying in school means earning a bit more than people who did not, every year after, for thirty or forty years running. So put the two sums side by side. In urban China, one more year of school was associated with about 4.0% to 10.2% more income a year, but those figures are from before 2001. They only give a rough scale.

Cost

No money. Sit down and run the sum once. About half an hour.

Benefit

This is an estimate for urban China from 1988 to 2001. How much more income one more year of school brings is called the return to education. The original text says it "rose sharply from 4.0% per year of schooling in 1988 to 10.2% in 2001." The rise was mainly after 1992. What it reflects is the widening of the extra pay of people who reached university over people who did not (the higher-education wage premium). This is a China-specific scale you can use when you turn "one more year of school" into a gap in yearly income. The global average is in item 7 of this section (the global average return to one more year of education)

Notes

Before you run the sum, first take off the tuition waivers and grants in item 4 of this section (vocational-school tuition and grants). There is also the account in item 2 of this section (one more year of education and mortality). The data stop at 2001 and cover only urban areas. They cannot be used directly as today's figures. The same is true of the global average of 9% in item 7 of this section. What is given here is a method, not an answer: run this way, the conclusion differs from person to person. Where tuition is high, the subject does not match the job, and the years of study are long, the sum may really come out not worth it. That only shows that this particular course is not worth it. It does not show that schooling is useless. A few things do not fit in the formula but do exist: legal education thresholds, in item 5 of this section (linked admission and separate exams in vocational education); resistance to being replaced, in item 10 (pick skills that resist automation); and whether you can change industry. The beneficiary is you

Sources

Zhang J, Zhao Y, Park A, Song X (2005). Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988 to 2001. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 730-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2005.05.008

23.7 Keep this baseline in mind: on average worldwide, the private return to one more year of education (the part that lands on your own income) is about 9% a year

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Money
Value: Very highEvidence A
In plain terms

On a worldwide average, one more year of school raises personal income by about 9% a year; the return for women has stayed higher than for men. This figure is about formal schooling; you cannot apply it directly to a short course. Use it as a yardstick: if a course costs you 30,000 yuan and half a year, ask whether the income change it brings matches one more year of school.

Cost

No money. Memorize this figure and use it as a yardstick for any "learn something" plan.

Benefit

A review covering 1950 to 2014, 139 countries, and 1120 estimates found: "the global average private return to one more year of education is 9% a year." Private return is the part that lands on the person's own income: one more year of school raises income by about 9% on average. The private return to higher education is rising. The social return to education (the part that lands on society as a whole rather than on the person) remains high. Women's average return to education stays higher than men's

Notes

This is a global average for "one more year of school." It is not the return to "signing up for a course," and it is not a China-specific figure. It is only a scale reference. Its use is to give every training plan a yardstick. If a course costs you 30,000 yuan and six months, ask whether it can bring an income change on the scale of one year of formal education. Also note that the global average hides large differences by subject and by country

Sources
  1. Psacharopoulos G, Patrinos HA (2018). Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426
  2. 世界银行政策研究工作论文 8402. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8402

23.8 Before you spend money on a certificate, check whether it is on the National Vocational Qualification Catalogue or on the list of evaluation agencies filed with the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence A
In plain terms

Some outfits run courses, charge fees, and issue certificates at will under the banner of new occupations or skill grades, and some impersonate authoritative bodies; the ministry has run targeted crackdowns. Before you enroll, check three steps: whether the occupation is on the National Vocational Qualification Catalogue, whether the issuer is an evaluation agency filed with human-resources authorities, and whether the certificate number can be found on the official platform. If it cannot be found, do not enroll.

Cost

No money. One check, about a dozen minutes.

Benefit

The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has run a nationwide campaign for this. The document names the problems as "some institutions and units arbitrarily holding training, evaluation, and certificate-issuing activities under the names of new-occupation vocational qualifications, vocational skill grades, and the like, charging fees at will and issuing certificates indiscriminately; some institutions and units making false or exaggerated claims, even organizing training, evaluation, and certificate issuance falsely in the name of an authoritative body." Measures include joint investigation with cyberspace, public security, and market-regulation departments, "severely cracking down on evaluation and certificate-issuing that impersonates appraisal bodies or evaluation agencies filed with human-resources authorities." Non-compliant promotion on websites and new media is shut down under the law. The document also requires "guiding the public to learn the channels and methods for checking certificates, and to judge whether a certificate is lawful and what it is worth"

Notes

Check in this order. First see whether the occupation is in the National Vocational Qualification Catalogue; if it is not, it is not a national vocational qualification. Next see whether the issuer is an evaluation agency filed with human-resources authorities. Finally go to the official skilled-talent evaluation certificate query platform and see whether the certificate number can be found. If it cannot be found, do not enroll. Certificates with the words "international," "advanced," or "registered," or that promise "guaranteed pass" or "income through hanging the certificate," carry the highest risk. For "credential upgrade" courses that sell diplomas, see Section 31, item 10 (credentials count only if they can be found on Xuexinwang (学信网 — China Higher Education Student Information and Career Center)).

Sources

人力资源社会保障部 (2022). 关于开展技术技能类「山寨证书」专项治理工作的通知. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/18/content_5679641.htm

23.9 It’s best to use government subsidies for training — don’t jump straight to paying for commercial courses out of pocket

  • Money No cost
  • Time Hours
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

From 2025 through the end of 2027, the government plans to run over 30 million person-times of subsidized training. Funding comes from multiple sources, including employment assistance funds, unemployment insurance funds, and corporate education budgets. The more in-demand a profession is and the higher the training cost, the larger the subsidy. Employees should ask their employers first; everyone else should review their local Human Resources and Social Security Bureau’s subsidy list before deciding what to study.

Cost

Zero cost, or at least a substantial reduction. Training does require time. The real challenge is resisting the urge to sign up for paid courses right away; first, check the local subsidy list.

Benefit

The national target is clear: over 30 million person-times of subsidized training for high-tech industries, critical sectors, and priority employment groups from 2025 through the end of 2027. Funding is pooled from various programs — employment assistance funds, unemployment insurance, sector development grants, East-West cooperation funds, and corporate education budgets. Subsidy amounts depend on how urgently a profession is needed and its training cost; they vary by occupation. Companies must also set aside and use employee education funds in full as required, with at least 60% going to frontline staff education and training.

Notes

Exact eligibility criteria and subsidy amounts are set by each province. The main portals are the “Subsidized Vocational Training List” on the local Human Resources and Social Security Bureau website and public training centers. Section 7 covers unemployment-related training subsidies (up to three times per person) and social insurance subsidies. Employees should first ask about their employer’s employee education funds. Checking the subsidy list first saves far more money than choosing a course first and then searching for financial aid.

Sources

国务院就业促进和劳动保护工作领导小组 (2025). 关于开展大规模职业技能提升培训行动的指导意见. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202507/content_7032222.htm

23.10 When picking a skill to learn, prioritize those that require hands-on work and on-the-spot judgment — these are the hardest for automation to replace

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Money
Value: Very highEvidence BDisputed
In plain terms

According to U.S. estimates, roughly 47% of jobs carry a relatively high risk of being taken over by computers. Later studies that evaluated individual tasks instead yielded a much lower percentage. Three core challenges currently prevent machines from handling certain jobs: manual dexterity, creative problem-solving, and social interaction. Hence, work that must be done on site, in non-standard environments, with judgment on the spot is harder to replace, while jobs with fixed processes that mainly handle information carry the highest risk.

Cost

No cost at all. Before making a choice, run through the skills you’re considering using this criterion as a filter.

Benefit

This study assessed 702 U.S. occupations to estimate the likelihood of each being automated. The result: about 47% of jobs (employment) fell into the high-risk range. The three aforementioned challenges form what the authors call “engineering bottlenecks” that limit automation potential. These include sensory perception and physical manipulation (finger and hand dexterity, working in cramped or awkward spaces), creative intelligence (the ability to devise novel solutions), and social intelligence (interpersonal interaction). Consequently, occupations requiring hands-on work in unstructured settings and on-the-fly judgment are consistently less prone to automation, rather than this being a random trait of specific jobs. Roles with standardized workflows and information-centric tasks face the greatest automation risk.

Notes

Disputed: Contested. This research is an unpublished draft paper from 2013 that measured the overall automation potential of entire occupations. Later studies that evaluated individual tasks instead produced a significantly lower high-risk percentage. The paper also does not specify a timeline for when automation might occur. When using these findings, avoid fixating on the 47% figure; instead, focus on the three key bottlenecks it identifies. Jobs involving on-site installation, maintenance, and caregiving are more resistant to replacement than purely clerical roles for precisely these reasons. Therefore, when deciding which skill to acquire, prioritize those that require being on site and facing non-standard environments.

Sources

Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

23.11 Check first whether a skill has an official grading system and if those grades can translate into pay raises

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence B
In plain terms

The government is promoting a “New Eight-Level Worker” system that requires companies to link job pay to employees’ skill levels. Outstanding workers can even have their skill grades recognized regardless of seniority or years of experience. This is the policy direction, though implementation varies widely across regions and companies. Only skills with established national occupational standards and grading pathways can eventually lead to pay increases based on those grades — so it’s worth checking first before you invest time in learning them.

Cost

No cost involved. One quick check is all you need.

Benefit

The government is actively rolling out this New Eight-Level Worker skill grading system. Official documents explicitly require linking skill grades to employee compensation, stating that “a skill-oriented pay distribution system must be strengthened... companies should adopt a compensation model that ties both job value and skill levels to pay.” Regions are also being urged to “expand the evaluation and hiring of senior-level workers and increase the frequency of such evaluations.” Eligible companies can conduct their own skill assessments for employees, and top performers can have their skill grades recognized without needing to meet any requirements related to years of service, prior grades, or seniority.

Notes

This is the intended policy direction, not a guarantee of actual pay increases — implementation varies greatly by region and company. The key takeaway for anyone considering learning a new skill is to first verify whether it has corresponding national occupational standards and a formal grading pathway; only then can it potentially lead to pay raises based on skill level. For "skills" with no grades and no industry entry threshold, after learning them you can only rely on yourself to find work.

Sources
  1. 国务院就业促进和劳动保护工作领导小组 (2025). 关于开展大规模职业技能提升培训行动的指导意见. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202507/content_7032222.htm
  2. 人力资源社会保障部 (2021). 「技能中国行动」实施方案. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-07/06/content_5622619.htm

23.12 Do not treat "high wages online" as a shortage of workers; check the local catalogue of occupations in short supply and the subsidy catalogue

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence C
In plain terms

How much training subsidy a locality gives for a trade is set by how urgently it is needed and by training cost, so the subsidy amount itself shows whether workers are short locally. Online claims of "monthly pay for a certain trade" are mostly posted rates on hiring platforms or personal self-reports. What you see is mostly people who already earned money, and hours, commuting, occupational disease, and busy versus slack seasons are not counted in.

Cost

No money. Look up two local documents.

Benefit

The subsidy amount itself is the official pricing of "which trades are short of people." Policy requires "a differentiated subsidy mechanism set by how urgently an occupation (trade) is needed, training cost, and similar factors," and localities set their own range of subsidized vocational skill training programs from that. So how much the subsidy for the same trade differs across cities directly reflects how short that trade is locally

Notes

Official wages by occupation go only to five broad post categories, with no specific trades. National Bureau of Statistics figures for 2025 put the average annual wage at enterprises above designated size at about 106,000 yuan (10.6万; exact value 106,080 yuan). Mid-level and above managers about 210,000 yuan (21万; exact value 210,016 yuan), professional and technical staff about 155,000 yuan (15.5万; exact value 155,491 yuan), clerical staff 94,936 yuan, production and manufacturing staff 80,739 yuan, and social production and personal-service staff 79,857 yuan. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security "100 occupations most short of workers" ranking can be checked on China Employment Network; the latest edition stops at the fourth quarter of 2022. That ranking is built from hiring and job-seeker data from public employment service agencies in 102 cities nationwide. Online claims of "monthly pay for a certain trade" almost all come from posted rates on hiring platforms or personal self-reports. What reaches you is mostly the people who earned money, and none of them count hours, commuting, occupational disease, or busy versus slack seasons. For real demand, check the subsidy catalogue on the local human resources and social security bureau site, then the job-demand ranking from public employment service agencies. Finally ask people already on the job at actual sites, factories, and shops

Sources
  1. 国务院就业促进和劳动保护工作领导小组 (2025). 关于开展大规模职业技能提升培训行动的指导意见. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202507/content_7032222.htm
  2. 国家统计局 (2026). 2025年城镇单位就业人员年平均工资情况:「规模以上企业就业人员年平均工资为106080元,其中,中层及以上管理人员210016元,专业技术人员155491元,办事人员和有关人员94936元,社会生产服务和生活服务人员79857元,生产制造及有关人员80739元」. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202605/t20260515_1963707.html
  3. 人力资源社会保障部就业培训技术指导中心 (2023). 2022年第四季度全国招聘大于求职「最缺工」的100个职业排行(中国就业网). https://chinajob.mohrss.gov.cn/c/2023-01-30/367442.shtml

23.13 For the same cost and time, prioritize short-duration programs that lead directly to employment

  • Money Low
  • Time Hours
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: OrdinaryEvidence C
In plain terms

Government policies favor short-term, quick-to-employ training programs and micro-specializations offered by vocational schools. The only criterion for picking a program is whether it provides a specific job role you can apply for after completion. Programs that take half a year to a year and still demand "more experience" after graduation actually cost far more time than their listed price. Write the exit condition before you start: if you have reached a set point and still have not found work, you stop.

Cost

These programs require payment for short-term courses, which isn’t a huge expense. They also demand a certain amount of time commitment. The tricky part is that if progress stalls before any results appear, you must still end the program per the original terms.

Benefit

Government messaging aligns with this approach: it supports “private training institutions running market-oriented, high-quality vocational training programs and short-term, quick-to-employ vocational training initiatives.” It also encourages vocational schools to “focus on skills and knowledge urgently needed by the job market... and offer micro-specializations and vocational training courses.”

Notes

The sole deciding factor is whether a specific job role is available for you to apply to after finishing the program. Programs that take half a year to a year and still demand "more experience" after graduation end up costing far more than their advertised price. The exit terms outlined in Section 4 also apply here: you must clearly define in advance that you’ll stop the program once you reach a certain skill level but still haven’t found a job.

Sources

国务院就业促进和劳动保护工作领导小组 (2025). 关于开展大规模职业技能提升培训行动的指导意见. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202507/content_7032222.htm

23.14 When you finish studying, close the book and test yourself first; do not go back and reread

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Time
Value: HighEvidence A
In plain terms

Compared with reading a section again, closing the book and testing yourself works better. Adding short quizzes in class raises scores by a moderate amount. When ten common study methods are ranked, self-testing sits in the top band. After one section, first write the main points from memory, then open the book and check.

Cost

No money, and total time need not rise. Turn the stretch you would have used to reread into closed-book writing from memory or doing problems. The hard part is that self-testing immediately shows what you did not remember, which feels worse than rereading.

Benefit

A meta-analysis of 222 independent studies and 48478 students: classroom quizzes raised academic scores, with a moderate effect size (g = 0.499). Effect size depends on several conditions: what study method the control group used, whether quiz format matched the final exam, whether materials matched, and whether corrective feedback was given. Also how many times the quiz was repeated, where and when it was given, how long the intervention lasted, and what experimental design was used. Another review that rated ten common learning methods one by one put "practice testing" and "spaced practice" in the highest band (high utility). The reason is that they work across ages and abilities, and have been checked across many assessment formats and real education settings.

Notes

Self-testing is to force material out of your head, not to assign a grade. Method: after a section, close the book, write the main points first, then open and check. Corrective feedback works better, so after checking answers see clearly where you went wrong. Benefit magnitude is recorded as "large" from effect size and rating. These two pieces of evidence measure scores, not hours saved, so the time-saving thresholds were not applied. Self-testing and item 15 (spread the same time over several days) are the two highest-rated methods in the same review; use them together.

Sources
  1. Yang C, Luo L, Vadillo MA, Yu R, Shanks DR (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309
  2. Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

23.15 Spread the same time over several days; do not finish it in one sitting

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Time
Value: HighEvidence A
In plain terms

The same time, spread over several days, sticks better than finishing in one sitting. There is also a practical rule: the longer you need to remember something, the longer the review gap should be. The farther the exam, the longer the gap, but research gives no universal number of days.

Cost

No money, and total time stays the same. What changes is only the schedule: the same 3 hours, split into 1 hour on each of three days. The hard part is starting several days ahead and not leaving it to the last night.

Benefit

A meta-analysis that pooled 184 papers, 317 experiments, and 839 evaluations of spaced practice. It compared two things: studying straight through versus studying in several sessions (the spacing effect), and short gaps versus long gaps (the lag effect). The conclusion is that review gap and "how long you need to remember" jointly set retention on the final test: the longer you need to hold the material, the longer the review gap that gives the best retention. Another review that rated ten common learning methods one by one put spaced practice in the highest band (high utility).

Notes

Best used stacked with item 14 (close the book and self-test): spread the self-tests themselves over several days. Much of the material in Cepeda's meta-analysis is word-list memory and the like; no universal best gap in days is given for complex content. "The farther the exam, the longer the gap" is the rule in the original; there is no concrete calendar. The problem with cramming the night before is not that it is useless on the spot, but that you forget fast.

Sources
  1. Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
  2. Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

23.16 Do not treat highlighting, rereading, and writing summaries as your main study methods

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

What students use most is highlighting and rereading, yet among ten common study methods both sit in the lowest band. Writing summaries, the keyword method, and imagining pictures for a text also sit in the lowest band. They are not completely useless, only useful under conditions that are too narrow; the same time spent on self-testing pays better.

Cost

No money; it saves time instead. The hard part is that these feel the easiest and most like "I am studying."

Benefit

A review that rated ten common learning methods by "whether the effect generalizes across learning conditions, student traits, materials, and assessment formats." Rated highest: practice testing and spaced practice. Rated moderate: elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, interleaved practice. Rated lowest, five methods: writing summaries, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword method, imagining pictures for a text, and rereading. The review states that most students say they use rereading and highlighting, but neither steadily raises scores. The review says they should be replaced with other methods, for example practice testing instead of rereading.

Notes

This is not a ban on underlining. Underlining can mark "which spots to self-test in a moment"; the problem is treating underlining itself as studying. The review also says the lowest band is not zero; the conditions where these methods work are narrow and need more research. For replacements see item 14 (close the book and self-test) and item 15 (spread the same time over several days).

Sources

Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

23.17 Mix several kinds of problems; do not do twenty of one kind in a row

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

Doing a long string of the same kind of problem feels smooth on the spot. Mixing several kinds works better over the long run, by a moderate amount. But this method is picky about material: picture tasks such as recognizing a painter's style work best; math problems a bit less; vocabulary is worse than blocked practice.

Cost

No money. Change doing the workbook by problem type into mixing the types. The hard part is that mixed practice has lower accuracy on the spot and feels like going backward.

Benefit

A multilevel meta-analysis of 59 studies, 238 effect sizes, and 158 samples. Overall, interleaved practice versus blocked practice has a moderate effect (Hedges' g = 0.42). By material, painting-style tasks are best (g = 0.67); other visual materials are also better. Math tasks have a smaller effect (g = 0.34). Expository text and taste materials show no significant overall effect. For vocabulary, blocked practice is better (g = −0.39). Regression shows: the more similar the categories, the less similar items within a category, and the more complex the material, the larger the gain from interleaving.

Notes

The review cited in item 16 (do not treat highlighting as the main study method) rated interleaved practice moderate, because research was still thin then. Taken together, mix practice when you need to "recognize which kind this is and which method to use," such as math problem types, patient cases, or which rule of law applies. Use blocked practice for rote content, such as vocabulary or term definitions.

Sources

Brunmair M, Richter T (2019). Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 145(11), 1029–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209

23.18 Do not pick a study method by "I am a visual learner, he is an auditory learner"

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

Many people believe everyone has a learning style, such as visual or auditory, and that teaching to the style makes learning better. Careful tests of this claim are few; almost none support it, and a few go the other way. People do have preferences, but there is no evidence that teaching to the preference makes learning better, so do not pay for style assessments.

Cost

No money. You simply stop picking materials and courses by this label, and stop paying for style assessments.

Benefit

A review commissioned to assess evidence on learning styles states: to show that "teaching by learning style" works, students must first be grouped by style, then each group randomly assigned to different teaching methods. The same test must be used at the end. The criterion of success is a specific interaction: the method that works best for one style is not the best for another. The review's conclusion is that almost no such interaction was found. There is a large literature on learning styles, but very few studies use an adequate experimental design, and several of those go directly against the "matching hypothesis." The authors therefore hold that current evidence is not enough to put learning-style assessment into education practice.

Notes

The review also says this does not mean every version of learning-style theory has been tested and rejected; many have never been tested. What to avoid is paying for style assessments and picking training courses by style. Criteria for picking training are in item 9 (prefer government-subsidized training channels) and item 13 (prefer short courses that lead straight to a job).

Sources

Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x

23.19 For material you must memorize, test yourself with questions in the form you will use later; do not count a verbatim run-through as done

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

Closing the book and testing yourself helps beyond the exact words you memorized. Across 192 comparisons and more than ten thousand people pooled, it also helps on questions with a changed format, on application problems, and on reasoning problems, by a moderate-to-small amount. Two cases work least well: swapping the question and the answer, and material you only saw in the book and were never tested on.

Cost

No money, and no extra time. What changes is only the practice: replace "run through it verbatim" with "test yourself with questions in the form you will use later." The hard part is first being clear how you will use this material later.

Benefit

A meta-analysis pooling more than 40 years of research, with 67 published and unpublished papers, 122 experiments, 192 transfer effect sizes, and 10,382 people in total. Compared with a control that looked again but was not tested, practice testing transferred learning to other situations, effect size d=0.40 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.50). Transfer was strongest when the test used a different question type, application and reasoning problems, medical-diagnosis-style questions, or near-meaning cue words. Transfer was weakest when stimulus and response were swapped, when material had been seen in first learning but never tested, and on example-style problems. Three moderators strongly affect whether positive transfer appears: whether response format matched between practice and test, whether retrieval practice with detailed feedback was done, and whether the first test was answered correctly. The authors also corrected for publication bias two ways. Moderator effect sizes changed little, but the intercept estimate was clearly pushed down: when none of the conditions above hold, positive transfer often does not appear

Notes

Everyday "memorize" bundles two things: going over the material again (rereading, highlighting), and actively recalling with the book closed. The first ranks lowest in the review that ordered ten study methods; for the ratings themselves see item 16 (do not treat highlighting, rereading, and writing summaries as main study methods). What to do is the second: actively recall with the book closed, as in item 14 (close the book and self-test), and spread it over several days, as in item 15 (spread over several days). Method: first be clear how you will use it later—selecting on a paper, or judging on the spot—then write questions in that form and test yourself. Swapping directions and testing the other way is also worth doing, because in this meta-analysis transfer in the swapped direction is weakest, so both directions need practice.

Sources

Pan SC, Rickard TC (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000151

23.20 First, figure out which professional series and level you belong to, then find the right application channels based on your employer type

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

There are 27 professional series nationwide, each divided into junior, intermediate, and senior levels. Generally, you must progress through these levels one by one. Employees working for organizations must have their applications reviewed and publicly posted by their employer before submission. Those working for private firms can apply via local professional qualification service centers, talent agencies, or industry associations. Self-employed individuals apply for the review organized by the local human resources and social security department.

Cost

No cost involved. It takes about half an hour to look up the latest application guidelines for your province.

Benefit

A total of 27 professional series exist across China, covering fields such as economics, engineering, healthcare, and publishing. These are categorized into senior, intermediate, and junior levels. Order No. 40 issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security applies to enterprises, public institutions, social organizations, individual economic entities, and self-employed professionals alike. Applicants must generally advance step by step through these levels. Employers must review all submitted materials and publicly display them for at least five working days. Private firms and self-employed individuals may have personnel agencies and the like handle the review, public posting, and recommendation. Local authorities are required to establish professional qualification service centers in science parks and high-tech zones; applications may also be accepted through talent agencies, industry associations, and professional societies. Eligible self-employed individuals may participate in evaluations organized by local human resources departments. Any documentation that can be verified online must not require additional certification. If any materials are missing, evaluators must clearly specify what is lacking in one single notice. Employees of private firms typically apply in the region where their employment contract is based. Those posted elsewhere who have worked there for a full year without a break may apply at the posting location. Retired personnel are ineligible to apply. Staff of public institutions (事业单位) who have received a sanction of a demerit (记过) or above cannot apply during the sanction period (nationwide).

Notes

No single nationwide list of required documents exists. Each professional series and province publishes its own annual application guidelines detailing necessary materials, deadlines, and performance criteria. Therefore, the first step is to search the official website of your provincial human resources department for the current year’s instructions. Papers are no longer required across the board: a 2016 reform opinion says papers are not a hard threshold for application-oriented professionals, and title foreign-language and computer exams are not a uniform requirement either. Technical workers have a path too: eligible highly skilled workers may take part in engineering-series title review. Civil servants may not take part in title review.

Sources
  1. 人力资源和社会保障部令第 40 号 (2019). 职称评审管理暂行规定. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2019/content_5437137.htm:第二条、第十三条、第十四条、第十五条、第十六条、第十七条、第十八条
  2. 人力资源社会保障部办公厅 (2020). 关于进一步做好民营企业职称工作的通知. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-03/03/content_5486340.htm:「在专业技术人才密集的创业孵化基地、高新技术开发区、科技园区等地设立职称申报受理服务点,或通过人才中介服务机构、工商联、行业协会商会、学会等社会组织受理民营企业专业技术人才职称申报」「民营企业专业技术人才被派驻外地连续工作一年以上的,可按有关规定在派驻地申报职称评审」
  3. 新华社 (2024). 职称评审进入高峰,信息如何查?有何新变化? https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202410/content_6978917.htm:「我国共设有经济、工程、卫生、出版等27个职称系列」「符合条件的自由职业者,可根据属地原则申报参加当地人社部门组织的职称评审」
  4. 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅 (2016). 关于深化职称制度改革的意见. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2017/content_5163445.htm:「不将论文作为评价应用型人才的限制性条件」「对职称外语和计算机应用能力考试不作统一要求」「符合条件的高技能人才,可参加工程系列专业技术人才职称评审」「公务员不得参加专业技术人才职称评审」

23.21 Junior and intermediate titles in fields such as accounting are earned by a national unified exam; first check education and years of work before you register

  • Money Low
  • Time Hours
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A
In plain terms

In some series, junior and intermediate titles are earned by exam; pass and you have them, with no separate review. Accounting works that way: assistant accountant needs high school or above; accountant needs a bachelor's plus 4 years of accounting work, or a junior-college diploma plus 5 years. People who already hold certain vocational qualifications may also be treated as holding the matching title.

Cost

Registration fees follow each province's standard. Preparing takes several months of spare time.

Benefit

A 2016 reform opinion provides that where junior and intermediate titles use a national unified exam, the matching review or recognition is no longer done. In fields where titles and vocational qualifications are closely linked, holding the vocational qualification can be recognized as holding the matching title and can also serve as a condition for applying one level higher. Take accounting. Assistant accountant and accountant use a national unified exam. Senior accountant combines exam and review; principal senior is generally review only. Registration conditions are as follows. Assistant accountant: high-school graduation or above, including secondary specialized, vocational high school, and technical school. Accountant: a doctorate; or a master's plus 1 year of accounting work; or a second bachelor's, graduate-class graduation, plus 2 years; or a bachelor's plus 4 years; or a junior-college diploma plus 5 years. Holders of a professional master's or doctorate in accounting may be exempt from Financial Management when sitting the accountant exam (nationwide)

Notes

Whether your series is exam, review, or exam-plus-review is in that series' "Guiding Opinions on Deepening Reform of the ×× Professional Title System." The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and industry authorities have issued them by series; they can be searched in the Chinese government website policy archive. Registration dates and subjects follow that year's exam notice. Civil servants may sit the accounting exam but may not take part in accounting title review.

Sources
  1. 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅 (2016). 关于深化职称制度改革的意见. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2017/content_5163445.htm:「专业技术人才取得职业资格即可认定其具备相应系列和层级的职称,并可作为申报高一级职称的条件。初级、中级职称实行全国统一考试的专业不再进行相应的职称评审或认定。」
  2. 人力资源社会保障部、财政部 (2019). 关于深化会计人员职称制度改革的指导意见. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2019-09/27/content_5433803.htm:「助理会计师、会计师实行全国统一的会计专业技术资格考试」「高级会计师采取考试与评审相结合方式,正高级会计师一般采取评审方式」「公务员符合条件的可以参加会计专业技术资格考试,但不得参加会计人员职称评审」
  3. 财政部等 (2024). 关于做好会计专业学位与会计专业技术资格衔接有关工作的通知. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202405/content_6952602.htm

23.22 Do not hire an agent to get a title for you, do not buy ghostwritten papers, and do not fake materials: once verified the title is revoked and a 3-year integrity record is kept

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Freedom
Value: HighEvidence A
In plain terms

A title obtained with fake materials, ghostwritten papers, or plagiarized work is revoked once verified. The integrity record is kept for 3 years and also goes onto the national credit platform. If the commitment letter you signed when applying is false, you cannot apply again for 3 years. Human-resources authorities also specifically crack down on agents' false advertising, fake reviews, and fake certificates.

Cost

No money. The hard part is resisting ads that say "pay to guarantee a pass."

Benefit

Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Order No. 40 provides that anyone who obtains a title by providing false materials, plagiarizing others' work or academic results, or other improper means has the title revoked. It is also entered in the title-review integrity archive and included in the national credit-information sharing platform, with a record period of 3 years. The 2024 supervision measures name several applicant violations: false commitments and forged information, ghostwritten or fake papers, fake performance records, and seeking favors. Applicants must sign a personal commitment letter; if the commitment is false, they may not apply for 3 years. Human-resources authorities, together with public security, cyberspace, and market regulation, investigate agents' fake websites, false advertising, contract traps, impersonated reviews, and fake certificates. Where the case is serious and may be a crime, it is transferred to the relevant authorities (nationwide)

Notes

One way to tell real from fake: a title from a proper review can be found on the national title-review information query platform. Entry points are the 12333 website, the 12333 mobile app, and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security site. Titles from review committees that were not filed cannot be found in that system. So promises of "guaranteed pass," "no need for you to attend," or "usable even if the certificate cannot be found" can basically be treated as problems. The beneficiary is mainly you; benefit magnitude is set by "avoiding title revocation and a 3-year integrity record." The accounting professional qualification exam is on the judicial interpretation list of "national examinations provided for by law"; arranging a substitute sitter, selling answers, or organizing cheating in that kind of exam is a crime. Simply buying answers and peeking yourself is not listed as a crime in the statute and is handled under the exam's discipline rules; see Section 9, item 29 (do not arrange a substitute sitter).

Sources
  1. 人力资源和社会保障部令第 40 号 (2019). 职称评审管理暂行规定. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2019/content_5437137.htm:第三十九条
  2. 人力资源社会保障部 (2024). 职称评审监管暂行办法. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202408/content_6969436.htm:第五条、第十五条、第十七条、第二十七条
  3. 人力资源社会保障部办公厅 (2022). 关于进一步做好职称评审工作的通知. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-12/24/content_5733407.htm:「未经备案的职称评审委员会,评审结果不纳入全国职称评审信息查询验证系统」
  4. 新华社 (2024). 职称评审进入高峰,信息如何查?有何新变化? https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202410/content_6978917.htm:「大家可通过www.12333.gov.cn网页、手机12333客户端、人力资源社会保障部门户网站、“人力资源和社会保障部”微信公众号等多种渠道进行登录」
  5. 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院 (2019). 关于办理组织考试作弊等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(法释〔2019〕13 号,第一条). https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbh/201909/t20190903_430901.shtml:「国家统一法律职业资格考试、国家教师资格考试、注册会计师全国统一考试、会计专业技术资格考试……等专业技术资格考试」

23.23 Getting a professional title does not automatically mean a salary raise: first find out whether your employer uses a post-based quota system or if the title alone doesn’t guarantee a post or raise

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Money
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B
In plain terms

A professional title is a basis for hiring, assessment, and promotion, but earning the title and being appointed to a post are two different things. Public institutions that use post management generally review within the post quota. Units that do not use post management can separate review from appointment; earning the title does not mean the unit will give the matching post and pay. After you change employer or locality, the title may need to be reviewed again or confirmed.

Cost

No cost at all. You only need to ask the HR department once.

Benefit

Article 2 of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Order No. 40 states that professional title evaluations are a key basis for hiring, assessing, and promoting technical professionals. A 2016 reform guideline specifies that public institutions that fully implement post management generally conduct evaluations within the post-structure ratios. For organizations without such a system, as well as for widely applicable professional categories and emerging occupations, title evaluation and post assignment can be separated. When technical professionals transfer between regions or employers, their titles are re-evaluated or confirmed per relevant administrative authority, unless otherwise stipulated by national regulations (nationwide).

Notes

The evidence grade is set to B because the documents describe how title evaluation and post assignment relate to each other but provide no nationwide figures on how much salary rises after earning a title. What you can do: In public institutions and state-owned enterprises, ask HR about available post openings and hiring rules. In private companies, ask the owner or manager whether the title is recognized and if it brings any pay increase.

Sources
  1. 人力资源和社会保障部令第 40 号 (2019). 职称评审管理暂行规定. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2019/content_5437137.htm:第二条、第二十九条
  2. 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅 (2016). 关于深化职称制度改革的意见. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2017/content_5163445.htm:「对于全面实行岗位管理、专业技术人才学术技术水平与岗位职责密切相关的事业单位,一般应在岗位结构比例内开展职称评审。对于不实行岗位管理的单位,以及通用性强、广泛分布在各社会组织的职称系列和新兴职业,可采用评聘分开方式。」

23.24 Whether to go on to a master's after a bachelor's: first count the tuition and the two or three years of wages you will not earn, then see whether your own subject pays more; people already at work can do a part-time master's, with the same certificate force as full-time

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Money
Value: Very highEvidence BDisputed
In plain terms

A master's costs tuition, and it also costs two or three years of wages you do not earn; the latter is usually the larger part. In a UK study, after differences in family background and bachelor's results were taken out, women who had done a master's earned only about 2% more at 35, and men about 2% less, with large gaps by subject. People already at work can do a part-time master's; the certificate has the same force as full-time, but you do not get the state grant.

Cost

No money. Look once at the admissions notice and the tuition schedule, then run the sum against the job opportunity you have in hand. About one or two hours.

Benefit

First the cost. A 2013 national opinion sets tuition for a full-time academic master's, in principle, at not more than 8000 yuan a year. A full-time professional master's follows the old fee policy and is not under that ceiling; it is often much more expensive. Full-time postgraduates inside the enrollment plan can all receive the state postgraduate grant. For a master's it is not less than 6000 yuan a year; the exact standard is set locally. Next the return. A study published by the UK Department for Education in 2020 used national student records and tax records to follow people who finished a bachelor's from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s. The study took out differences in family background and in bachelor's results, and looked at income at 35. The original wording is "we estimate returns of 2% (women) and -2% (men) for masters": women who had done a master's earned about 2% more than women with only a bachelor's, and men about 2% less. The subject gap is large. Women who did a master's in law, economics, or management earned about 20% more; those who did arts, English, or philosophy earned more than 10% less. For men, the master's return was clearly negative in most subjects, but law, economics, management, and engineering were still clearly positive. People already at work can sit a part-time master's and study while working. A 2016 Ministry of Education notice provides that part-time and full-time sit the same entrance exam and are trained to the same standard. The two kinds of academic and degree certificates "have equal legal status and the same force"; the graduation certificate notes the mode of study. The state grant goes only to full-time postgraduates inside the enrollment plan; part-time students do not receive it. In 2019, five ministries including the Ministry of Education issued a notice. Civil-service recruitment and open hiring by public institutions and state firms must give equal job opportunity to postgraduates of different modes of study. Those hirings must not set application conditions unrelated to the post. The Ministry of Education 2021 graduate employment notice states that recruitment notices of Party and government organs, public institutions, and state firms must not use mode of study as a restrictive condition. The 2022 notice again states that all kinds of campus recruitment must not restrict that way

Notes

Disputed: Contested. Earlier UK studies kept finding a positive return to a master's. The authors of this study think their own data are finer and the adjustments cleaner. The authors also grant that they could not adjust away differences such as motivation and job preferences. The data stop at age 35 and use people who graduated twenty or thirty years ago. No figure that adjusts for personal differences in the same way was found for China, so this can only be read as a direction. The evidence grade is therefore B. The way to run the sum is the same as item 6 of this section (study or go to work): set the two or three years of wages not earned against the extra earned each year after. Some job notices state outright that a master's is required, for example universities, research institutes, and some state firms. In that case the education threshold is itself the return, and it has to be counted separately. The part-time notices are ministry notices; they state no penalty and no office to complain to if they are broken. They govern how recruitment notices are written; they do not govern whom the employer finally picks. Campus recruitment has an explicit limit; no explicit rule on mode of study was found for private employers' open social hiring. The 2025 admissions management rules state that part-time programs in principle admit only people already at work who will return to their original employer after graduation. Tuition, awards and aid, and housing are written by the school into the admissions charter. How household registration and files are handled is not uniformly set in any national document found for this book; before you apply, read the notice carefully and ask the school.

Sources
  1. 财政部、国家发展改革委、教育部 (2013). 关于完善研究生教育投入机制的意见(财教〔2013〕19号). https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2013/content_2404719.htm:「原则上,现阶段全日制学术学位研究生学费标准,硕士生每生每年不超过8000元,博士生每生每年不超过1万元。全日制专业学位研究生以及目前已按规定实行收费政策的研究生,暂执行原收费政策」「博士生资助标准不低于每生每年1万元,硕士生资助标准不低于每生每年6000元」
  2. Britton J, Buscha F, Dickson M, van der Erve L, Vignoles A, Walker I, Waltmann B, Zhu Y (2020). The earnings returns to postgraduate degrees in the UK. Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f609e478fa8f5106d1563cc/PG_LEO_report_FINAL.pdf
  3. 教育部办公厅 (2016). 关于统筹全日制和非全日制研究生管理工作的通知(教研厅〔2016〕2号). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/201609/t20160914_281117.html:「按照国家有关规定发给相应的、注明学习方式的毕业证书」「全日制和非全日制研究生实行相同的考试招生政策和培养标准,其学历学位证书具有同等法律地位和相同效力」
  4. 财教〔2013〕19号同上:「研究生国家助学金范围覆盖全国研究生招生计划内的所有全日制研究生」
  5. 教育部办公厅等五部门 (2019). 关于进一步做好非全日制研究生就业工作的通知(教研厅函〔2019〕1号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/05/content_5490220.htm:「各级公务员招录、事业单位及国有企业公开招聘要根据岗位需求合理制定招聘条件,对不同教育形式的研究生提供平等就业机会,不得设置与职位要求无关的报考资格条件」
  6. 教育部 (2020). 关于做好2021届全国普通高校毕业生就业创业工作的通知(教学〔2020〕5号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-12/01/content_5566303.htm:「在招聘公告和实际操作中不得将毕业院校、国(境)外学习经历、学习方式(全日制和非全日制)作为限制性条件」
  7. 教育部 (2021). 关于做好2022届全国普通高校毕业生就业创业工作的通知(教学〔2021〕5号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-11/21/content_5652326.htm:「在各类校园招聘活动中,不得设置违反国家规定的有关歧视性条款,不得将毕业院校、学习方式(全日制和非全日制)等作为限制性条件」
  8. 教育部 (2024). 2025年全国硕士研究生招生工作管理规定(教学〔2024〕4号)第七十七条. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202410/content_6978684.htm:「招生章程中应按相关规定公布本单位各专业硕士研究生报考条件、学习方式、学制、学费标准、奖助办法、毕业就业、住宿情况以及培养所在校区等内容。原则上招生单位非全日制硕士研究生招收在职定向就业人员」

23.25 Whether to go on to a doctorate after a master's: do it only if the job you want states that it requires a doctorate, and count the mental load before you start

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Money
Value: Very highEvidence BDisputed
In plain terms

In the same UK study, after differences in family background and bachelor's results were taken out, at 35 a doctorate earned women about 8% more than a bachelor's alone, and men about 9% less. The mental load of a doctorate is also heavy. About one in four doctoral students across countries has clear depressive symptoms, and about one in six has clear anxiety symptoms. So first see whether the job you want will not hire without a doctorate, then decide whether to do one.

Cost

No money. Look through the education requirements in the job notices of the place you want to work, then talk once with two or three people who are doing a doctorate.

Benefit

The 2020 UK Department for Education study cited in item 24 of this section (doing a master's) also calculated the doctorate. The original wording is "8% (women) and -9% (men) for PhDs": after taking out differences in family background and in bachelor's results, at 35 a doctorate earned women about 8% more than a bachelor's alone, and men about 9% less. The study also found that a doctorate lowered the chance of unemployment and the chance of annual income below 30000 pounds, and also lowered the chance of annual income above 40000 pounds. Subjects differ a lot. The return to a doctorate in mathematics was especially low. A doctorate in psychology was among the highest. The mental load during the doctorate is in a 2021 pooled analysis. Across 16 studies and 23469 doctoral students, those with clear depressive symptoms came to about 24% in total (95% CI 18%–31%, the credible range). Across 9 studies and 15626 doctoral students, those with clear anxiety symptoms were about 17% (12%–23%). The studies differed a great deal from each other (I² about 98%). The cost in China follows the 2013 opinion: tuition for a full-time academic doctorate is in principle not more than 10,000 yuan a year, and the state postgraduate grant is not less than 10,000 yuan a year

Notes

Disputed: Contested. The depression and anxiety figures only pool the proportions from surveys in various countries. They are not compared with people of the same age, and the scales used are not the same. So they show that these symptoms are common among doctoral students. They do not show that doing the doctorate caused them. A pooling of Chinese-language studies found little difference in psychological symptoms between doctoral students and master's students, but both were higher than the national norm and the youth norm. The limits of the income figures are the same as in item 24 of this section (doing a master's). They can only be read as a direction. Job notices for university teaching posts, research institutes, and some research-and-development posts often state that a doctorate is required. If you want that path, first go through the notices of the last few years at the place you want. If low mood during the course lasts more than two weeks, first do the things in Section 3, item 18 (what to do first when mood is low). If there are thoughts of suicide, call 12356. See Section 1, item 25 (call 12356 when depressed or having thoughts of suicide).

Sources
  1. Britton J, Buscha F, Dickson M, van der Erve L, Vignoles A, Walker I, Waltmann B, Zhu Y (2020). The earnings returns to postgraduate degrees in the UK. Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f609e478fa8f5106d1563cc/PG_LEO_report_FINAL.pdf
  2. Satinsky EN, Kimura T, Kiang MV, et al. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among Ph.D. students. Scientific Reports, 11, 14370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93687-7
  3. Liu H, Gao Y, Tuerxun N, Cabirou L (2026). More than Depression: Doctoral Students' Mental Health in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 16, 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081355
  4. 财政部、国家发展改革委、教育部 (2013). 关于完善研究生教育投入机制的意见(财教〔2013〕19号). https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2013/content_2404719.htm