How To Live Better Tiếng Việt

This book is written about mainland China. Where it says national, domestic or the state, it means China, not your country.

Search / Section 30

30 Children after starting school

Section 20 covers the first year after a child is born. Section 18 covers how much money and time raising a child costs. The years in between, ages 3 to 18, are in this section. The item on screen time by age starts at age 0, because the official tiers are 0–3, 3–6, and primary/secondary school; splitting them would make the guidance harder to use. This section answers one question: when “don’t delay schoolwork” collides with “the body,” which things cannot wait. They cannot wait because they have time windows; once missed, they cannot be made up. Whether schoolwork should be that intense is not discussed here — only the windows and the numbers.

The first eight items, item 12 (cycloplegic refraction), item 13 (pit and fissure sealants), items 15 through 19, and item 21 (head hit during sport) are scored on death and lasting physical or mental harm. Among them, items 16 and 17 are about how to parent at home: no hitting or yelling, and take a parenting class that teaches concrete skills. Item 18 is about not sending a child to a closed “internet addiction” school. Item 19 is about teaching a child which body parts are private and to tell you if they were touched. Item 9 (do not buy products that “cure myopia”) and item 20 (do not ride on the road under age) are scored on money. Item 10 (written rules on sleep, homework, PE, and rankings), item 11 (leave of absence with enrollment kept), and item 14 (when a child loves games) are scored on time. Drowning, traffic, helmets, and HPV vaccine are in Section 1. Infants are in Section 20. Scams against children and game top-ups are in Section 5. Red lines minors themselves must not cross are in Section 9. How to recognize an emergency and call a car is in Section 13. Children after a parent dies are in Section 29. None of that is repeated here.

Items in this section are grouped by theme below (numbers in parentheses are item numbers).

Care that cannot wait: sudden severe pain — go to hospital at once (item 1); do not put off treatment to wait for exams (item 2); the annual student health-check report (item 7).

Eyes and teeth: enough outdoor time, 2 hours a day (item 4); screen rules by age (item 5); deeper myopia degrees (item 6); do not buy products that “cure myopia” (item 9); cycloplegic refraction (item 12); pit and fissure sealants (item 13).

At school: report bullying the same day (item 3); written rules on sleep, homework, PE, and rankings (item 10); leave of absence with enrollment kept (item 11).

Mental health and parenting at home: depression screening (item 8); when a child loves games (item 14); when a child says they like the same sex (item 15); do not hit when disciplining (item 16); take a parenting class (item 17); do not send to an internet-addiction school (item 18); know private body parts (item 19).

Roads and playing fields: do not ride on the road under age (item 20); after a head hit in sport, do not play again that day (item 21).

Items in this section (21)
  1. 30.1 If a child says there is sudden severe pain that is getting worse, go to the hospital at once — do not make them tough it out until after school
  2. 30.2 Do not put off needed treatment to “wait until exams are over”; some windows follow bone age, not the exam calendar
  3. 30.3 If a child is bullied, report it to the school the same day and ask for a written process; for hitting, taking money, or spreading rumors, call the police at once
  4. 30.4 Have the child spend at least 2 hours outdoors each day — among options that cost no money and use no drug, this is the only myopia-prevention method backed by randomized trials
  5. 30.5 Ages 0 to 3: no screens; ages 3 to 6: as little as possible; primary and secondary students: non-study use no more than 1 hour a day
  6. 30.6 Treat myopia as lasting damage: the higher the degree, the more retinal detachment, macular disease, and glaucoma later
  7. 30.7 Take a close look at your child’s annual school health report and take any abnormal item to a hospital to be checked that same year
  8. 30.8 Have kids aged 12 to 18 screened once for depression, and do not treat a school mental health assessment as a diagnosis
  9. 30.9 Do not buy products or services claiming to “cure myopia” or “reduce refractive error”
  10. 30.10 Clear rules exist for sleep, homework, sports, and rankings; if schools fail to comply, parents can raise the issue
  11. 30.11 If a child cannot keep going, they can take leave; the school must keep their enrollment, up to 1 year
  12. 30.12 If poor vision is detected, go to the hospital for cycloplegic refraction and follow up at the recommended intervals as advised by the doctor
  13. 30.13 Pit and fissure sealants applied after permanent molars emerge
  14. 30.14 If a child loves games, first check whether sleep, homework, and going outdoors are being squeezed out — do not only watch how long they play
  15. 30.15 If a child says they like the same sex, do not scold, do not throw them out, do not send them for “conversion”: how the family reacts ties to whether they attempt suicide
  16. 30.16 When disciplining, do not hit, and do not yell or call them stupid: children often hit or yelled at have more behavior and mood problems
  17. 30.17 If the child is hard to manage and you keep hitting or yelling, take a parenting class that teaches concrete skills
  18. 30.18 Do not send a child to a closed “internet-addiction school” or “special training camp”: the law bans harming body or mind to treat internet addiction, and children have already been locked up until they died
  19. 30.19 Teach a child which body parts are private; if someone touches them or asks them to keep a secret, they must tell you at home; when they tell, believe them first, do not scold, and take them to report and seek care
  20. 30.20 Do not let a child under 12 ride a bicycle on the road, or under 16 ride an e-bike on the road: if they hit someone, parents pay; if they are hit, they may still bear a share
  21. 30.21 If a child hits their head in sport and then has headache, dizziness, or fogginess, do not put them back in that day; if they keep vomiting, grow sleepier, or the headache keeps getting worse, go to emergency at once

30.1 If a child says there is sudden severe pain that is getting worse, go to the hospital at once — do not make them tough it out until after school

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: Very highEvidence A

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Some illnesses are counted in hours. Sudden severe pain on one side of a boy’s scrotum may be testicular torsion — the vessel feeding the testis twists and blood supply stops. Treated within 6 hours, the testis is saved in 97.2% of cases. Wait until 19 to 24 hours and only 42.5% remain. This pain will not wait until after school or until exams are over.

Cost

No money. Take a half day off and take the child to emergency care.

Benefit

Following the rules, 30 case series with 2116 patients with testicular torsion were collected and pooled. Of these, 1283 were timed in 6-hour bands. From pain onset, testis salvage was 97.2% at 0 to 6 hours, 79.3% at 7 to 12 hours, 61.3% at 13 to 18 hours, 42.5% at 19 to 24 hours, 24.4% at 25 to 48 hours, and 7.4% after 48 hours. In broader bands: 90.4% within 12 hours, 54.0% at 13 to 24 hours, and 18.1% after 24 hours. The authors conclude salvage can still happen past the usual 6 to 8 hour talk. So even if pain has gone on a long time, still get care — do not stay home because “it’s too late anyway.” In U.S. pediatric hospital data for 2000, 2003, and 2006, 2443 boys from 1 month to under 18 years had surgery for testicular torsion. Age of onset has two peaks: the first year of life, and early puberty

Notes

Tell boys in advance: if there is sudden severe pain down there, say so at once — no need to be shy. Testicular torsion is common in boys just entering puberty. Many kids are too embarrassed to speak and tough it out; that is the author’s experience. Other hour-counted problems include acute appendicitis (delay can lead to perforation), diabetic ketoacidosis, and meningitis. This section did not verify hour-by-hour harm for each of those. The author’s shared signal: sudden onset, keeps getting worse, unlike any prior episode. How to recognize emergencies and call a car is in Section 13.

Sources
  1. Mellick LB, et al. (2019). A Systematic Review of Testicle Survival Time After a Torsion Event. Pediatric Emergency Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001287
  2. Zhao LC, Lautz TB, Meeks JJ, Maizels M. (2011). Pediatric testicular torsion epidemiology using a national database: incidence, risk of orchiectomy and possible measures toward improving the quality of care. Journal of Urology, 186(5), 2009-2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.024

30.2 Do not put off needed treatment to “wait until exams are over”; some windows follow bone age, not the exam calendar

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower A lot
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence A

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Scoliosis is a sideways bend of the spine. A brace is a hard shell vest that holds the spine. Worn while bones are still growing, 75% of children never reach a 50-degree curve by the end of growth; observation alone is only 42%. The wearable window follows when bones finish growing, not the high-school or college exams — wait until after exams and you may miss it.

Cost

No money; the only choice is early or late. Leave and follow-ups take time; the cost of treatment itself is separate. The hard part is that a brace must be worn at least 18 hours a day, and the child must keep putting up with it.

Benefit

A multi-hospital trial enrolled 242 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who met criteria for bracing. Of these, 116 were assigned by lot and 126 chose for themselves whether to wear a brace. Success and failure were defined in advance: curve growing past 50 degrees was failure; still below that at skeletal maturity was success. Brace-group children were asked to wear at least 18 hours a day. Results were analyzed by initial assignment, whether or not they actually wore enough. Assigned brace group success 75%, assigned observation only 42% (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.85–9.16), roughly 4 times the chance of success versus observation alone. Combining the lot-assigned and self-chosen groups: 72% versus 48% (after leveling baseline differences, OR 1.93, 1.08–3.46, still about 1.9 times). More hours worn per day meant higher success (P<0.001; this link is unlikely to be chance). The trial stopped early because the brace worked

Notes

Scoliosis is the example here because it has lot-assigned trials and a clear time window. It is also a focus item on student health checks (see item 7). In the author’s experience, similar cases include strabismus, amblyopia, dental caries, and congenital heart disease surgeries that can be timed. The later they are done, the worse the result may be, or the higher the cost. This section did not verify each one; ask a specialist about the exact window. If missing class is the fear, during compulsory education a leave of absence can last up to 1 year with enrollment kept — see item 11.

Sources

Weinstein SL, et al. (2013). Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307337

30.3 If a child is bullied, report it to the school the same day and ask for a written process; for hitting, taking money, or spreading rumors, call the police at once

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence A

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Children bullied by peers are about 2.2 times as likely to have suicidal thoughts as those not bullied, and about 2.6 times as likely to have attempted suicide. Schools that receive a report must investigate at once; if bullying is found, they must discipline or punish, and serious cases must not be hidden — they must be reported to public security. So report the same day, ask for the formal finding process, and keep a written record.

Cost

No money. Go to the homeroom teacher and the school’s student-bullying governance body. To call the police, dial 110. The hard part is resisting pressure to “not make a big deal of it.”

Benefit

34 studies with 284375 children and adolescents pooled. Peer bullying linked to suicidal thoughts, OR 2.23 (95% CI 2.10–2.37), about 2.2 times the chance versus not bullied. Another 9 studies, 70,102 people: bullying linked to suicide attempts, OR 2.55 (1.95–3.34), about 2.6 times. Results held across sex, age, and study quality. The link of cyberbullying to suicidal thoughts was stronger than offline bullying. Article 21 of the Regulations on School Protection of Minors (未成年人学校保护规定) lists five kinds of conduct: beating, kicking, slapping, grabbing/biting, shoving, pulling; insults, mockery, humiliating nicknames; snatching, forcing goods, or deliberate damage to property; malicious exclusion and isolation; fabricating facts online to defame or spread rumors. The same article says that when the side with an advantage in age, body, or numbers does these things willfully or maliciously and causes bodily harm, property loss, or mental harm, it may be found to be bullying. Article 22 requires staff who notice abnormal mood or bodily injury to inquire promptly and report. Article 23 requires the school, on receiving a report, to investigate at once, submit it to the bullying-governance body for finding and handling, and notify parents to take part. If bullying is found, educational discipline or a disciplinary sanction must follow. Serious bullying that violates public-security administration or may be a crime must not be concealed and must be reported promptly to public security and education authorities (nationwide, in force from 1 September 2021)

Notes

Article 22 names the signals: clear mood changes and bodily injury. If a child has injuries they cannot explain, or mood suddenly goes wrong, ask first. This pooled analysis only follows records and has no assigned controls, so it cannot prove bullying alone causes suicide. The direction and size of the risk are clear. The Plan for Comprehensive Governance of Bullying Among Primary and Secondary Students (加强中小学生欺凌综合治理方案) also requires a strict distinction between bullying and ordinary rough play among students. So the school must make a finding; a line like “kids just playing” is not enough.

Sources
  1. van Geel M, et al. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4143
  2. 教育部 (2021). 未成年人学校保护规定(教育部令第 50 号,第二十一、二十二、二十三条). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-06/02/content_5614946.htm
  3. 教育部等十一部门 (2017). 加强中小学生欺凌综合治理方案(教督〔2017〕10 号,三(一)). https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2018/content_5294435.htm

30.4 Have the child spend at least 2 hours outdoors each day — among options that cost no money and use no drug, this is the only myopia-prevention method backed by randomized trials

  • Money No cost
  • Time Hours
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence A

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

An extra 40 minutes of outdoor class each day in grade 1 cut new myopia over three years from about four in ten to about three in ten. The health commission’s dose is at least 2 hours of daytime outdoor time a day, or 14 hours a week in total. Cloudy days count.

Cost

No money. But time must be cleared each day, often squeezed from homework and online classes. The hard part is doing it every day, not a few times.

Benefit

Grade-1 students in 12 Guangzhou primary schools were assigned by lot at school level (intervention schools 952 people, control schools 951, mean age 6.6 years). The intervention added one 40-minute outdoor activity class each school day and encouraged parents to take children out more after school. Over 3 years, new myopia was 30.4% in the intervention group (259 of 853 eligible) and 39.5% in controls (287 of 726). Difference −9.1 percentage points (95% CI −14.1 to −4.1, P<0.001); the true gap sits roughly between 4 and 14 percentage points fewer. Over 3 years, refractive progression (spherical equivalent change) was −1.42 D versus −1.59 D, a difference of 0.17 D (P=0.04). The intervention group progressed a little less. D is the unit for refractive power. Axial length (front-to-back eye length) growth did not differ between groups (P=0.07). Ten Core Knowledge Points for Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) requires at least 2 hours of daytime outdoor activity a day, or 14 hours a week cumulative. It notes that even on cloudy days outdoor activity has a protective effect, and asks to avoid the early-afternoon hours of high heat and strong sun. Drug prevention of myopia also has lot-assigned trials. In Hong Kong, 474 children aged 4 to 9 without myopia were split into three groups and used eye drops once nightly for two years. With 0.05% atropine, myopia over two years was 28.4%; with placebo, 53.0%. With 0.01% atropine it was 45.9%, not different from placebo

Notes

This trial ran only 3 years, and participating children all started at age 6. A 9.1 percentage-point gap in myopia rates only keeps some children from becoming myopic; it does not guarantee no myopia. The same ten core points also give a few practices. Reading and writing: “one chi, one fist, one cun” (一尺一拳一寸). After 20 minutes of near work, look into the distance for 20 seconds or more. For primary and secondary students, non-study screen use should not exceed 15 minutes at a time or 1 hour a day in total. “Being outdoors” is not the same as “PE class”; standing outside at recess counts. Authors of the atropine trial say more trials are needed to confirm, and long-term safety still needs watching. Whether to use drops and at what strength, ask an eye doctor. The author found no other method that costs no money and uses no drug with a lot-assigned trial.

Sources
  1. He M, et al. (2015). Effect of Time Spent Outdoors at School on the Development of Myopia Among Children in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10803
  2. Yam JC, Zhang XJ, Zhang Y, et al. (2023). Effect of Low-Concentration Atropine Eyedrops vs Placebo on Myopia Incidence in Children: The LAMP2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 329(6), 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.24162
  3. 国家卫生健康委办公厅 (2023). 防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条(国卫办妇幼函〔2023〕278 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202307/content_6894284.htm

30.5 Ages 0 to 3: no screens; ages 3 to 6: as little as possible; primary and secondary students: non-study use no more than 1 hour a day

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower A lot
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B

For Child under 3 at home / Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

The national health commission says ages 0 to 3 get no screens, and ages 3 to 6 should avoid them as much as possible. For primary and secondary students, non-study use is no more than 15 minutes at a time and no more than 1 hour a day. The reason is that long near work makes myopia come early. Evidence that screens cause myopia is weaker; what has been shown to work is 2 hours outdoors a day.

Cost

No money. The hard parts are taking the screen out of the child’s hands, and parents themselves looking less in front of the child.

Benefit

Article 4 of Ten Core Knowledge Points for Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) says in the original wording: “Infants and toddlers aged 0–3 shall not use phones, tablets, computers, or other screen electronic products; children aged 3–6 shall avoid contact with and use of phones, tablets, computers, and other screen electronic products as much as possible; for primary and secondary students, non-study screen use should not exceed 15 minutes per session, and cumulative daily use should not exceed 1 hour.” The same article states that “prolonged near use of electronic screen products readily depletes children’s hyperopia reserve and is an important cause of early and high rates of myopia in children and adolescents.” The 2018 implementation plan from the Ministry of Education and seven other departments gives parents the same requirements and adds “the younger the age, the shorter continuous use of electronic products should be.” Research evidence is much weaker: a systematic review took in 33 studies, 11 entered the pooled calculation, ages from 3 months to 33 years. Counting only phones and tablets, the odds ratio for myopia was 1.26 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.60, I²=77%). Combined with computers it was 1.77 (1.28 to 2.45, I²=87%). The authors conclude only “may be related,” and state that none of the 33 studies had a reliable measure of screen time

Notes

Grade B because officials give tiered rules, not numbers from a trial. The lower bound of the research odds ratio sits at 1.00, and the authors only dare say “may be related.” Treat it as a household rule that is easy to run, not as “no screens means no myopia.” What has a lot-assigned trial behind it is item 4 (2 hours outdoors). Preschool eyes should also be checked. The same document says ages 1–3, 4–6, and after 7 should all have regular refractive screening to see how much hyperopia reserve remains. How to check is in item 12 (cycloplegic refraction). Screens and children’s language ability were also pooled in a meta-analysis of 42 studies with 18,905 people. Longer screen time went with weaker language (r=−0.14, 95% CI −0.18 to −0.10). But co-viewing and educational content went the other way (r=0.16 and 0.13). That is association, not cause — it only shows that swapping screens for talking with the child is a poor trade.

Sources
  1. 国家卫生健康委办公厅 (2023). 防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条(国卫办妇幼函〔2023〕278 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202307/content_6894284.htm
  2. 教育部等八部门 (2018). 综合防控儿童青少年近视实施方案(教体艺〔2018〕3 号). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A17/moe_943/s3285/201808/t20180830_346672.html
  3. Foreman J, Salim AT, Praveen A, et al. (2021). Association between digital smart device use and myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(12), e806-e818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00135-7
  4. Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA (2020). Associations between screen use and child language skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(7), 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327

30.6 Treat myopia as lasting damage: the higher the degree, the more retinal detachment, macular disease, and glaucoma later

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: Very highEvidence A

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Myopia does not heal on its own, and the degree does not go back down. It is also not only a “wear glasses” matter. Versus people without myopia, the chance of myopic macular disease is over ten times higher in mild myopia and hundreds of times higher at 600 degrees or more. Retinal detachment is about 3 times higher in mild myopia and about 13 times higher at 600 degrees or more. So the deeper a child’s myopia climbs, the more risk they carry later.

Cost

No money. This item itself needs no action; what to do is in items 4 and 5 (2 hours outdoors, screen rules by age).

Benefit

A systematic review and meta-analysis pooled studies before June 2019 into three degree bands: mild (−0.5 to −3.00 D), moderate (−3.00 to −6.00 D), high (≤−6.00 D, 600 degrees or more). Versus people without myopia, odds ratios for myopic macular degeneration were 13.57 (95% CI 6.18 to 29.79), 72.74 (33.18 to 159.48), and 845.08 (230.05 to 3104.34). Retinal detachment: 3.15 (1.92 to 5.17), 8.74 (7.28 to 10.50), 12.62 (6.65 to 23.94). Posterior subcapsular cataract: 1.56 (1.32 to 1.84), 2.55 (1.98 to 3.28), 4.55 (2.66 to 7.75). Open-angle glaucoma: mild 1.59 (1.33 to 1.91); moderate and high combined 2.92 (1.89 to 4.52). Odds ratios for visual impairment at age 60 and above: 1.71 (1.07 to 2.74), 5.54 (3.12 to 9.85), 87.63 (34.50 to 222.58). Ten Core Knowledge Points for Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents (防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条) says the same: 600 degrees or more is high myopia; in that group, rates of cataract, open-angle glaucoma, myopic macular disease, retinal detachment, myopic optic neuropathy, and other blinding eye diseases are clearly higher than in other groups, and “myopia can be prevented and controlled but is not reversible”

Notes

Studies pooled were all observational, and the odds ratios are unusually large. For high myopia and macular degeneration, the credible range runs from 230 to 3104, so underlying studies differ a lot. Read the numbers as order of magnitude, not exact values. The visual-impairment set in the Benefit line is for people aged 60 and above. The author infers these outcomes mostly show up in middle and old age. Myopia is not finished once glasses are fitted — it is worth the effort to delay and control it. Follow-up after diagnosis is in item 12 (cycloplegic refraction). Do not buy products that claim a cure — see item 9 (cure myopia).

Sources
  1. Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Tedja MS, Verhoeven VJM, Klaver CCW (2020). The complications of myopia: a review and meta-analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 61(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.4.49
  2. 国家卫生健康委办公厅 (2023). 防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条(国卫办妇幼函〔2023〕278 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202307/content_6894284.htm

30.7 Take a close look at your child’s annual school health report and take any abnormal item to a hospital to be checked that same year

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Primary and secondary schools run one student health check a year. On the report, focus on overweight, obesity, malnutrition, abnormal spinal curvature, poor vision, and dental caries. Do not glance at height and weight and put the sheet away. If any of these are abnormal, take the child to a specialist that same year and get it clear.

Cost

No cost at all. During compulsory education, the health check fee is paid from the school’s public funds, so parents pay nothing extra.

Benefit

The 2021 Administrative Measures for Health Checks of Primary and Middle School Students requires all such schools to run one health check per year for every enrolled student. The physical exam covers the head, neck, chest, spine, limbs, skin, and lymph nodes, while the eye exam checks external eye condition, distance vision, and refractive errors (degree of myopia or hyperopia). The individual report issued to each student must include all test results, an overall assessment, and tailored health guidance. Overweight, obesity, malnutrition, spinal curvature issues, poor eyesight, and dental cavities are all designated as priority areas for follow-up. Education authorities are also required to keep records of students with health problems and follow up with them. All costs for these compulsory education health checks are paid by school budgets, with no extra charges for parents (issued nationwide in September 2021).

Notes

The grade is B because the document is a set of administrative rules for schools, not a study on the actual effectiveness of these checks. It guarantees that schools will run annual checks covering the listed items and follow up on any abnormalities, but does not confirm that all identified issues will receive timely intervention. These health checks are only a preliminary screening tool, not a formal diagnosis. For poor eyesight, a pupil dilation refraction test at an ophthalmology clinic is required (see Item 12). For spinal curvature issues, a visit to an orthopedics or spinal surgery specialist is necessary (see Item 2 — do not delay treatment to wait until after exams). Parents are responsible for arranging these follow-up appointments for their children.

Sources

国家卫生健康委、教育部 (2021). 中小学生健康体检管理办法(2021 年版)(国卫医发〔2021〕29 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-10/21/content_5644100.htm

30.8 Have kids aged 12 to 18 screened once for depression, and do not treat a school mental health assessment as a diagnosis

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

U.S. prevention guidelines recommend screening children aged 12 to 18 for major depression; for age 11 and under the evidence is not enough. In the U.S., suicide is the second cause of death among ages 10 to 19. The school’s yearly mental-health assessment is only a census, not a diagnosis. If the child says they feel bad, go straight to psychiatry or clinical psychology.

Cost

Costs range from zero to just a few dozen yuan; this covers filling out a screening questionnaire at a community clinic or hospital outpatient department. Calling the 12355 and 12356 hotlines is completely free.

Benefit

In 2022, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued a recommendation statement advising that adolescents aged 12 to 18 be screened for major depressive disorder; this recommendation falls under Category B, meaning the evidence supporting it is moderate and the benefits are also moderate, making it worthwhile. For children aged 11 and under, there is insufficient evidence to support depression screening (an I statement, which indicates a lack of evidence and no formal recommendation). Likewise, evidence regarding both the benefits and harms of screening children and adolescents specifically for suicide risk is also insufficient (another I statement). The document emphasizes that suicide is the second leading cause of death among 10- to 19-year-olds, and that major depression in youth is closely linked to numerous later issues, including recurrent depressive episodes in adulthood and other mental disorders, as well as a heightened risk of suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and death by suicide. China’s “Ten Measures to Further Improve Mental Health Care for Primary and Secondary School Students” calls for establishing a three-tier support system: homeroom teachers, full- and part-time school counselors, and psychiatrists. Each student should undergo a mental health assessment, generally no more than once per academic year. The measures also stress the need to improve referral pathways to mental health specialists and reintegration processes after recovery. Additionally, they highlight the importance of leveraging the 12355 Youth Service Hotline and the 12356 Psychological Assistance Hotline (issued nationwide in October 2025).

Notes

This B rating reflects the original recommendation strength grading used by the task force, rather than a quantifiable measure of actual effectiveness. It represents a U.S.-based recommendation; no equivalent official screening guidelines currently exist in China. A positive screening result merely indicates the need for a follow-up evaluation — it does not constitute a formal diagnosis. Guidance on handling suicidal thoughts can be found in Section 1, item 25, while family coping strategies are outlined in Section 29.

Sources
  1. US Preventive Services Task Force (2022). Screening for Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.16946
  2. 教育部办公厅 (2025). 进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施(教基厅〔2025〕2 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202510/content_7045528.htm

30.9 Do not buy products or services claiming to “cure myopia” or “reduce refractive error”

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

The State Administration for Market Regulation explicitly states that “under current medical technology, myopia cannot be cured.” Claims such as “recovery,” “reducing refractive error,” “curing myopia,” and “repairing refractive error” are to be strictly investigated and punished. If you encounter any of these terms, you can safely rule out those products without further comparison. Devices such as eye-care instruments are considered medical devices, and e-commerce platforms must verify whether sellers are qualified to sell them.

Cost

There is no cost involved; in fact, you save this money by avoiding such purchases.

Benefit

A notice from the General Office of the State Administration for Market Regulation on its special enforcement campaign from November 2021 to March 2022 clearly reiterates that “under current medical technology, myopia cannot be cured.” It mandates strict legal action against any marketing of products aimed at preventing or controlling myopia in children and adolescents that employ misleading language like “recovery,” “restoration,” “reducing refractive error,” “curing myopia,” “myopia remedy,” or “repairing refractive error.” The notice also calls for intensified efforts to combat practices that misuse traditional Chinese medicine terminology or theories for deceptive advertising, as well as two specific types of false advertising: using patient testimonials or images to compare pre- and post-treatment outcomes, and making guaranteed claims regarding treatment safety or effectiveness. Additionally, e-commerce platforms are required to rigorously verify the qualifications of sellers offering medical devices such as eye-care instruments and other specialized products (nationwide).

Notes

Grade B is given because the basis comes from regulatory determinations during enforcement actions rather than from controlled comparative trials of actual products. However, both health authorities and regulators agree on the statement “Myopia can be prevented and controlled, but it cannot be reversed.” The only two evidence-backed recommendations appear in item 4 (outdoor activities) and item 12 (proper eye examinations, glasses fitting, and follow-ups). Information on blue-light-blocking glasses can be found in Section 6.

Sources

市场监管总局办公厅 (2021). 关于开展儿童青少年近视防控产品违法违规商业营销宣传专项整治行动的通知. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-11/12/content_5650400.htm

30.10 Clear rules exist for sleep, homework, sports, and rankings; if schools fail to comply, parents can raise the issue

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

These rules are all laid out in writing: elementary students must get 10 hours of sleep per day, junior high students 9 hours, and high school students 8 hours. Elementary classes generally start no earlier than 8:20 a.m., and secondary school classes no earlier than 8:00 a.m. In 2025, an additional requirement was added that schools must provide at least 2 hours of combined physical activity per day, and students must not be ranked based on test scores. If your child consistently fails to get enough sleep, use these rules as a reference point rather than blaming the child for being slow to get ready.

Cost

No cost involved. All you need is to know these rules so you can bring them up with the school or local education authorities when necessary. The real challenge is simply speaking up about it.

Benefit

The Notice on Further Strengthening Sleep Management for Primary and Secondary School Students stipulates that elementary students must get 10 hours of sleep daily, junior high students 9 hours, and high school students 8 hours. Elementary classes generally start no earlier than 8:20 a.m., and secondary school classes generally no earlier than 8:00 a.m. Schools are prohibited from requiring students to arrive at school early for mandatory educational activities. Elementary students generally go to bed no later than 9:20 p.m., junior high students no later than 10:00 p.m., and high school students no later than 11:00 p.m. Off-campus tutoring institutions must end no later than 8:30 p.m., and live online tutoring must end no later than 9:00 p.m. From 10:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. the next day, game services for minors are banned nationwide (issued March 2021). The Ten Measures for Further Strengthening Mental Health Work Among Primary and Secondary School Students contains several additional provisions. All schools are required to ensure students get at least 2 hours of combined physical activity per day, and the practice of offering 15-minute recess periods is encouraged. Students must not be ranked based on test scores, and repetitive, punitive homework assignments are strictly prohibited. It also encourages schools to set one “homework-free day” each week (nationwide, issued October 2025).

Notes

Both documents were issued by relevant education authorities. Implementation varies widely across different regions and schools, which is why this item is rated B. Their main purpose is to help parents understand what schools are obligated to provide, so they have solid grounds to bring these issues up when needed. Information on adult sleep needs can be found in Sections 2 and 3.

Sources
  1. 教育部办公厅 (2021). 关于进一步加强中小学生睡眠管理工作的通知(教基厅函〔2021〕11 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-04/02/content_5597443.htm
  2. 教育部办公厅 (2025). 进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施(教基厅〔2025〕2 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202510/content_7045528.htm

30.11 If a child cannot keep going, they can take leave; the school must keep their enrollment, up to 1 year

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Leave of absence has a formal system. Parents or other guardians apply; after the school confirms, it reports upward for approval. One leave lasts at most 1 year; if more is needed when it ends, apply again. During leave the school must keep the child’s enrollment; on return they continue. Exact rules are set by each province — ask the school office or the local education bureau.

Cost

No money. Parents or other legal guardians apply to the school. The hard part is accepting that the child will stop for a while.

Benefit

Article 16 of the Measures for the Administration of Primary and Secondary Student Enrollment Status (中小学生学籍管理办法) sets how leave works. The student takes leave on application by parents or other legal guardians. After the school confirms, it reports to the higher enrollment-status office for approval. On return the school must process the related steps promptly. One application for leave shall not exceed 1 year; if more leave is truly needed when it ends, a new application must be filed. During leave the school shall keep the enrollment status (student identity and place are held). Exact leave and return rules are made by provincial education authorities (nationwide, issued January 2025). Ten Measures to Further Strengthen Mental Health Work for Primary and Secondary Students (进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施) requires advancing referral of mental illness for medical care and return-to-school mechanisms after recovery, and guiding schools to make plans for sudden campus psychological crises

Notes

In the author’s experience, before applying ask three things: what medical certificate is needed, how enrollment is recorded in the system during leave, and whether return is to the same grade or one grade down. Grade B because conditions for leave, materials to submit, and how return is joined are all set by provincial education departments; the national level only builds a frame. Article 12 of the Regulations on School Protection of Minors (未成年人学校保护规定) also requires compulsory-education schools to keep reporting and filing systems for dropouts, leave, and long absences. So leave is something schools already process, not a special favor for you alone.

Sources
  1. 教育部 (2025). 中小学生学籍管理办法(教基〔2025〕1 号,第十六条). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202502/content_7002620.htm
  2. 教育部办公厅 (2025). 进一步加强中小学生心理健康工作十条措施(教基厅〔2025〕2 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202510/content_7045528.htm
  3. 教育部 (2021). 未成年人学校保护规定(教育部令第 50 号,第十二条). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-06/02/content_5614946.htm

30.12 If poor vision is detected, go to the hospital for cycloplegic refraction and follow up at the recommended intervals as advised by the doctor

  • Money Low
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Cycloplegic refraction involves using special eye drops that relax the eye’s focusing muscles, allowing an accurate measurement of refractive errors. This test is performed in hospitals and is the most reliable method for diagnosing myopia. The Health Commission confirms these drops do not harm healthy eyes and that vision returns to normal after they wear off. Do not rely on quick computerized refraction tests at optical shops for diagnosis, and do not withhold glasses from children out of fear that it will worsen their myopia.

Cost

The examination and glasses fitting typically cost several tens to several hundred yuan. After using the eye drops, children may be sensitive to light and have blurry near vision; it usually takes half a day to a couple of days for this to subside.

Benefit

The “Ten Core Principles for Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Children and Adolescents” outlines how cycloplegic refraction works: it uses a cycloplegic agent to relax the focusing muscles before measuring refractive errors. This medical procedure is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing myopia, providing the most accurate results. The drops themselves are safe for healthy eyes; side effects such as light sensitivity and blurred near vision are temporary and resolve after treatment ends. Once myopia is confirmed, timely corrective measures—such as wearing appropriate glasses—are essential. Proper glasses can correct vision and slow progression of the condition. For those whose vision is normal with glasses, preschool and elementary school children should be rechecked every 3–6 months and middle and high school students every 6–12 months; whether to change glasses is decided according to the situation. Regular refractive screenings are also recommended at ages 1–3, 4–6 and from age 7 on, to monitor hyperopia reserve (远视储备量, "farsightedness reserve"). (National guidelines issued July 2023)

Notes

Grade B is given because the information originates from official public health publications rather than original research containing specific quantitative data. Because high myopia increases the risk of complications such as retinal detachment, follow-up visits serve purposes beyond simply updating prescriptions. “Poor vision” noted during school screenings is merely an initial indicator; a full ophthalmologic evaluation at a hospital is still required, as detailed in item 7.

Sources

国家卫生健康委办公厅 (2023). 防控儿童青少年近视核心知识十条(国卫办妇幼函〔2023〕278 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202307/content_6894284.htm

30.13 Pit and fissure sealants applied after permanent molars emerge

  • Money Low
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower None
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Pit and fissure sealing fills the grooves on the chewing face of big molars with resin so food scraps cannot pack in. Two years after sealing, the chance of cavities is about one eighth of not sealing. If 16% of tooth surfaces would decay without sealing, with sealing it is only about 5%. It still works four years later.

Cost

A few dozen to one or two hundred yuan per tooth. No anesthesia is needed, no tooth grinding is required, and the whole procedure takes only a few minutes. Many regions offer free sealant programs for children who meet the age criteria.

Benefit

This conclusion comes from 38 separate trials involving 7,924 children aged 5–16, all selected and pooled by Cochrane according to strict methodological standards. The studies compared children who received resin-based sealants with those who did not. For first permanent molars in the 5–10 age group, the odds ratio after 24 months was 0.12 (95% CI 0.08–0.19), meaning the risk of decay was roughly one-eighth that of untreated teeth. This result is based on seven trials with 1,548 participants randomly assigned and 1,322 actually examined; the overall evidence quality is rated as moderate. If the untreated control group shows 16% decayed surfaces within 24 months, the sealed group shows only 5.2% (range 3.13%–7.37%). When the control group rate reaches 40%, the sealed group still stays at 6.25% (3.84%–9.63%); at a 70% control rate, the sealed group remains at 19% (12.3%–27.2%). After 48–54 months the odds ratio remains low at 0.21 (0.16–0.28), indicating a risk roughly one-fifth that of untreated teeth. Authors conclude that resin sealants reduce cavity formation by 11%–51% compared with no sealants at 24 months. No adverse effects were reported in any of the four trials that monitored side-effects; however, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether glass-ionomer sealants perform better than other types.

Notes

The first permanent molars — teeth that never get replaced — typically appear around age 6, with the second set emerging near age 12. Sealants should be applied as soon as these molars emerge and before any decay sets in; once a cavity has formed, sealants can no longer be used and filling is required instead. Many regions provide free sealant programs for eligible children, so it’s worth checking with the local Chinese CDC or community health centers. No nationwide document with exact coverage criteria or age limits could be identified for this section, so those details are omitted here. Preventing dental caries remains a key focus of school-age health screenings; see item 7 for further information.

Sources

Ahovuo-Saloranta A, et al. (2017). Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5

30.14 If a child loves games, first check whether sleep, homework, and going outdoors are being squeezed out — do not only watch how long they play

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Time
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

True “gaming disorder” is about two or three people in a hundred. If questionnaire cutoffs are low and only teens are sampled, the rate looks high. Looking at real logs from game companies, there is almost no sign that playing more or less changes happiness. By rule, minors may play only Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and holidays from 8 pm to 9 pm.

Cost

No money. Once a week notice when they sleep, whether homework is turned in, and whether they go out.

Benefit

A meta-analysis pooled 53 studies from 17 countries, 226,247 people. Prevalence of gaming disorder was 3.05% (95% CI 2.38–3.91; that is the credible range). Counting only studies with stricter sampling, 1.96%. Results differed widely across studies; 77% of the spread came from which questionnaire was used. Teen samples, low cutoff scores, and small samples all push the rate up. Another study took data from 7 game companies and linked 38935 players’ real play time over six weeks to self-reported happiness. Almost no evidence that play time affects happiness. The National Press and Publication Administration requires game firms to offer minors only 1 hour of service a day on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and statutory holidays, from 20:00 to 21:00 (nationwide / international, from 2021)

Notes

Grade B because prevalence swings a lot with the questionnaire, and the happiness study followed only six weeks. In the author’s judgment, the most common cost of games is crowding out sleep and outdoor time; no research number was found for that sentence. Written sleep rules are in item 10 of this section (sleep, homework, PE). Outdoors are in item 4 of this section (2 hours outdoors a day); screen time is in item 5 of this section (non-study use no more than 1 hour a day). Top-ups and refunds are in Section 5, item 9 (child uses a phone to top up or tip). If grades, sleep, and family ties all collapse together and talk will not stop it, take the child to psychiatry or child psychology. Do not send them to a closed internet-addiction school — see item 18 of this section (internet-addiction schools). The beneficiary is the child.

Sources
  1. Stevens MW, Dorstyn D, Delfabbro PH, King DL. (2021). Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867420962851
  2. Vuorre M, Johannes N, Magnusson K, Przybylski AK. (2022). Time spent playing video games is unlikely to impact well-being. Royal Society Open Science, 9(7), 220411. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220411
  3. 国家新闻出版署 (2021). 关于进一步严格管理切实防止未成年人沉迷网络游戏的通知(国新出发〔2021〕14 号). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-09/01/content_5634661.htm

30.15 If a child says they like the same sex, do not scold, do not throw them out, do not send them for “conversion”: how the family reacts ties to whether they attempt suicide

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Among Chinese secondary students, children who like the same sex or both sexes attempt suicide in a year about 3 to 5.5 times as often as others. Overseas research finds that teens strongly rejected at home attempt suicide far more later. Those parents send for “conversion” also attempt suicide far more.

Cost

No money. The hard part is parents digesting their own feelings first and not saying cruel words in the moment.

Benefit

A domestic survey covered 506 secondary schools in 7 provinces, 150822 students from grade 7 through grade 12. Past-year suicide attempts among boys: opposite-sex only 2.2%, same-sex only 6.9%, both sexes 12.2%. Girls: 3.1%, 8.9%, 10.9%. That is about 3 to 5.5 times peers who only like the opposite sex. Researchers subtracted age, academic pressure, family finances, and bullying. After that, for boys the two groups had OR 3.13 (95% CI 2.28–4.28) and 3.83 (2.85–5.14), about two to three times higher. A meta-analysis of 35 studies found OR 3.50 (2.98–4.12) for sexual-minority adolescents attempting suicide. A U.S. study interviewed 224 gay and bisexual youth aged 21 to 25 about family reactions in adolescence. Versus peers with almost no family rejection, high rejection had OR 8.4 for attempting suicide. In another study, parents who themselves tried to change the child’s sexual orientation: OR 3.08 (1.39–6.83) for the child’s suicide attempt. Parents who also sent the child to a therapist or religious figure: 5.07 (2.38–10.79) (China / multi-country / U.S.)

Notes

Grade B because these are one-time surveys, and the degree of family rejection relies on adult recall — they show association, not which caused which. Parents need not agree at once; first do not do things that harm the child. In law, parents must not abuse or abandon a child, and must not use domestic violence against a child. Habitual insults and intimidation also count as domestic violence. If the child is low and says they do not want to live, call 12356 first — see Section 1, item 25 (call 12356 when there are suicidal thoughts). You can also go to psychiatry under item 8 of this section (one depression screen at ages 12 to 18). Why not touch “conversion” is in Section 6, item 28 (do not do sexual-orientation conversion). Beneficiaries are the child, and you.

Sources
  1. Huang Y, Li P, Guo L, et al. (2018). Sexual minority status and suicidal behaviour among Chinese adolescents: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 8(8), e020969. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020969
  2. di Giacomo E, Krausz M, Colmegna F, Aspesi F, Clerici M. (2018). Estimating the Risk of Attempted Suicide Among Sexual Minority Youths: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(12), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2731
  3. Ryan C, Huebner D, Diaz RM, Sanchez J. (2009). Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in white and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics, 123(1), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3524
  4. Ryan C, Toomey RB, Diaz RM, Russell ST. (2020). Parent-Initiated Sexual Orientation Change Efforts With LGBT Adolescents: Implications for Young Adult Mental Health and Adjustment. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1538407
  5. 全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法(第十七条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0
  6. 全国人大常委会 (2015). 反家庭暴力法(第二条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=2c909fdd678bf17901678bf7f9d60889

30.16 When disciplining, do not hit, and do not yell or call them stupid: children often hit or yelled at have more behavior and mood problems

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower A lot
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence ADisputed

For Child under 3 at home / Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Children often hit are more aggressive and have more mental problems, are more distant from parents, and get heavier hitting more often. Whether hitting makes a child obey on the spot is unclear in the evidence. Children often yelled at or called stupid at age 13 later get in more trouble and have more depression; even warm parenting day to day does not cancel that.

Cost

No money. The hard part is stopping hands and mouth when anger rises, and switching to a way of parenting without hitting or yelling. What to switch to is in item 17 of this section (parenting classes that teach concrete skills).

Benefit

First, hitting. One meta-analysis counted only “open-hand spanking of the buttocks or limbs.” It pooled 75 studies, 111 effect sizes, 160927 children. Of 17 outcomes, 13 clearly linked to spanking, all in the bad direction. d is effect size; 0.2 is small, 0.5 medium. Childhood aggression d = 0.37 (95% CI 0.13–0.61, credible range). Externalizing problems 0.41 — hitting, breaking rules. Internalizing 0.24 — anxiety, depression. Mental health problems 0.53; poor relationship with parents 0.51; low self-esteem 0.15; poorer cognition 0.17. Physical abuse by parents 0.64. Adult antisocial behavior 0.36; adult mental health problems 0.24. Across 111 effect sizes, d = 0.33 (0.29–0.38). Whether the child obeyed on the spot was not clearly linked to spanking (d = 0.14, −0.19–0.47); that outcome had only 5 effect sizes. Another review looked only at before-and-after follow-up studies, 69 of them. Physical punishment stably predicted more later behavior problems; no link to any long-term good outcome was seen. Of 7 studies that counted how often hitting happened, 5 found more hitting linked to worse problems. Next, yelling. A U.S. study followed 976 two-parent families. At age 13, if parents often yelled, used foul language, or called the child stupid or lazy, misconduct and depressive symptoms both rose between ages 13 and 14. Whether parents were usually warm did not cancel the link. The reverse also held: children with more misconduct at 13 later got yelled at more. In law, parents must not use domestic violence against a child. Article 2 of the Anti-Domestic Violence Law (反家庭暴力法) lists forms of domestic violence: beating, binding, maiming, restricting personal liberty, and habitual insults and intimidation. Article 12 requires guardians to do family education in civilized ways. When parents infringe a child’s rights, residents’ and villagers’ committees must counsel and stop them, and report serious cases to public security. Public security, procuratorates, and courts that find this must admonish the parents and may order them to accept family-education guidance (nationwide)

Notes

Disputed: Almost all these studies only follow records and have no assigned controls, so they cannot show which caused which. In the spanking meta-analysis, 72% of studies only looked at whether two things appeared together, or relied on later recall. Another meta-analysis took only before-and-after follow-up studies. After subtracting the child’s prior behavior, the link of spanking to externalizing problems fell to 0.07, and to internalizing to 0.10. Those authors judged the effect small. Still another meta-analysis found “conditional spanking” better than 10 of 13 other discipline methods at reducing defiance and antisocial behavior. It also found that hitting too hard or relying mainly on hitting was worse than other methods. So the opposing side can show: light, conditional spanking is not necessarily worse than other methods. Heavy hitting and frequent hitting and yelling are worse on both sides. An occasional single hit or shout is not named domestic violence in the statute, which names beating and habitual insults and intimidation. Main beneficiaries are children. If someone else in the household hits the child, police reports and protection orders are in Section 8, item 43 (personal safety protection order). Anyone who sees long-term hitting of a child in another household may dissuade or report to public security, civil affairs, or education. For a stranger’s household, calling 110 or telling the residents’ committee is enough — do not go in yourself to break up a fight.

Sources
  1. Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000191
  2. Heilmann A, Mehay A, Watt RG, et al. (2021). Physical punishment and child outcomes: a narrative review of prospective studies. Lancet, 398(10297), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00582-1
  3. Wang MT, Kenny S. (2014). Longitudinal links between fathers' and mothers' harsh verbal discipline and adolescents' conduct problems and depressive symptoms. Child Development, 85(3), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12143
  4. Ferguson CJ. (2013). Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.002
  5. Larzelere RE, Kuhn BR. (2005). Comparing child outcomes of physical punishment and alternative disciplinary tactics: a meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-2340-z
  6. 全国人大常委会 (2015). 反家庭暴力法(第二、十二条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=2c909fdd678bf17901678bf7f9d60889
  7. 全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法(第十一、十七、一百一十八条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0
  8. 全国人大常委会 (2021). 家庭教育促进法(第二十三、五十三条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081817cac3b2d017cac5a6c6f0109

30.17 If the child is hard to manage and you keep hitting or yelling, take a parenting class that teaches concrete skills

  • Money No cost
  • Time Hours
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Medium
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence A

For Child under 3 at home / Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

For children who were already hard to manage, after parents took a class that teaches concrete skills, hitting and rule-breaking went down, and parents’ mood improved. Parents also hit and yelled less — clearest right after the course, still there one to two years later but much smaller. Shanghai has tried this kind of class; it worked.

Cost

Parent schools run by schools and kindergartens, and online parent schools run by governments at provincial level and above, are written in law as public-interest. The evidenced programs meet weekly or every other week, 1 to 2 hours each time, from four to twenty-four weeks. Practice at home is required. The hard part is finishing and practicing every day.

Benefit

Cochrane pooled 13 trials, 10 of them lot-assigned, 1078 parents. Children aged 3 to 12 all had behavior problems. Included programs met weekly or every other week, 1 to 2 hours each time, at least three sessions. Short ones ran 4 weeks straight; long ones 24 weeks. After the course, children’s behavior problems fell. Parent ratings SMD −0.53 (95% CI −0.72 to −0.34, credible range); independent raters −0.44 (−0.77 to −0.11). SMD and d are the same scale; 0.5 is medium. Parent mental health improved, −0.36 (−0.52 to −0.20). Harsh or negative parenting fell: parent ratings −0.77 (−0.96 to −0.59), independent −0.42 (−0.67 to −0.16). Authors say these are short-term effects. Another meta-analysis screened 346 lot-assigned trials; 60 measured hitting and yelling of children, across 22 countries. Hitting and yelling fell right after the course, d = −0.46 (−0.59 to −0.33). At 1 to 6 months −0.24 (−0.37 to −0.11). At 7 to 24 months −0.18 (−0.34 to −0.02), smaller later. Most of these data are parent-reported. There are domestic trials too. Shanghai randomized 81 parents; some took Triple P group classes. After the course, children’s adjustment problems and parents’ parenting and mood were better than waitlist parents, and still at 6 months. At a rural kindergarten, 191 caregivers took part; some self-studied online lessons plus two group discussions. Two weeks after finishing, self-reported child-abuse behaviors were about 33% lower than in those who only got a book (IRR 0.67). At three months, children’s behavior problems were also lower (d = −0.40). The Family Education Promotion Law (家庭教育促进法) requires parents to study family-education knowledge on their own. Primary and secondary schools and kindergartens may run parent schools and hold regular public-interest family-education guidance. Residents’ and villagers’ committees may run community parent schools. Governments at provincial level and above must run public-interest online parent schools and service hotlines. Family-education guidance bodies must not organize for-profit training (nationwide, in force from 1 January 2022)

Notes

Grade A because of numbers pooled from Cochrane and multiple lot-assigned trials. Programs in the trials share a few traits. Instructors teach concrete skills — for example playing with the child, praise, rewards, and discipline. Parents practice and role-play in class and get homework. Programs that only handed out materials or only discussed were excluded, so the evidence does not cover one lecture. What domestic public parent schools teach and how varies by place and may not be this kind. When choosing a class, see whether it runs for several weeks and makes you practice concrete skills. Common program names in the two meta-analyses include Triple P and Incredible Years. This book does not recommend specific providers or paid products. The drop in hitting and yelling shrinks after one to two years; keep practicing after the course ends. Beneficiaries are the child and you. If the child already has severe mood problems, take them to psychiatry or child psychology — see item 8 of this section (depression screening).

Sources
  1. Furlong M, McGilloway S, Bywater T, Hutchings J, Smith SM, Donnelly M. (2012). Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD008225. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008225.pub2
  2. Backhaus S, Leijten P, Jochim J, Melendez-Torres GJ, Gardner F. (2023). Effects over time of parenting interventions to reduce physical and emotional violence against children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine, 60, 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102003
  3. Guo M, Morawska A, Sanders MR. (2016). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Triple P With Chinese Parents in Mainland China. Behavior Modification, 40(6), 825–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516644221
  4. Wang W, Zhang H. (2026). A self-directed parenting program to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in rural China: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 173, 107937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.107937
  5. 全国人大常委会 (2021). 家庭教育促进法(第十八、二十五、三十一、三十八、四十条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081817cac3b2d017cac5a6c6f0109

30.18 Do not send a child to a closed “internet-addiction school” or “special training camp”: the law bans harming body or mind to treat internet addiction, and children have already been locked up until they died

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence C

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

The law clearly bans treating internet addiction in ways that harm a child’s body or mind. At a special training school in Hefei, a boy just sent there was cuffed in a solitary room and died about 44 hours later. Yuzhang Academy (豫章书院) in Nanchang locked students in solitary; four people were sentenced, and when parents asked for tuition back the court did not support them.

Cost

No money, and you save the tuition. The hard part is, when the child is at their worst, parents holding back from handing them to outsiders for “closed discipline.”

Benefit

Article 68 of the Law on the Protection of Minors (未成年人保护法) says no organization or individual may intervene in minors’ internet addiction in ways that harm minors’ physical or mental health. Both cases below have court judgments. The first was in Hefei, Anhui. In August 2017, parents of an 18-year-old boy signed an agreement with a special training school to treat internet addiction. School staff took him by force, locked him in a solitary room, and cuffed both hands to the window bars. They restricted food, water, and rest, and beat him. About 44 hours later the boy died. The appraisal concluded heat, restricted posture, lack of food and drink, and trauma caused water-electrolyte disorder and death. On 31 October 2018, Hefei Intermediate Court gave the first-instance judgment. The school head was convicted of intentional injury and unlawful detention and sentenced to 16 years. Four instructors got 1 year to 8 years and 6 months. On 28 December 2018, Anhui Higher Court upheld on second instance. The second-instance ruling stated the school had no approval from the relevant departments, and none of the defendants had teaching qualifications. The second was in Nanchang, Jiangxi. Yuzhang Academy opened in 2013 and was deregistered and closed in November 2017. While open, the school took some students into a “frustration relief room” for solitary confinement with dedicated guards, three to ten days each time. On 28 April 2023, Anyuan District Court in Pingxiang retried and gave first-instance judgment: five defendants constituted unlawful detention. Four were sentenced; Xinhua’s wording was “fixed-term imprisonment ranging from two years and ten months to eleven months.” Those four were also barred for a set period from education-related work; one was exempted from criminal punishment. Parents asked for tuition and travel costs back; the court did not support them (nationwide / Anhui / Jiangxi)

Notes

Grade C because there are only individual cases, no statistics on how often such schools go wrong. The Hefei case exists only in media reports that cite the first-instance judgment and second-instance ruling; the judgment text was not found on the court website. The Yuzhang Academy case is a Xinhua report of the court pronouncement. If a child loves games, first follow item 14 of this section (when a child loves games) and see whether sleep, homework, and going out are squeezed out. If grades, sleep, and family ties all collapse and talk will not stop it, take the child to psychiatry or child psychology for diagnosis and then treatment. If already sent in, bring the child home. If the child says they were locked up or beaten, call the police. The beneficiary is the child.

Sources
  1. 全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法(第六十八条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0
  2. 红星新闻 (2019-02-20). 追热点·18岁少年被铐着关禁闭两天死亡,戒网瘾学校5人获刑. https://static.cdsb.com/micropub/Articles/201902/5b98283216ea5d2e8eef7f8cb7d4dbbb.html(网页存档 https://web.archive.org/web/20261005013030/https://static.cdsb.com/micropub/Articles/201902/5b98283216ea5d2e8eef7f8cb7d4dbbb.html)
  3. 新华社 (2023-04-28). 江西“豫章书院案”宣判 5名被告均服判不上诉. http://www.news.cn/2023-04/28/c_1129579126.htm(网页存档 http://web.archive.org/web/20230428212544/http://www.news.cn/2023-04/28/c_1129579126.htm)

30.19 Teach a child which body parts are private; if someone touches them or asks them to keep a secret, they must tell you at home; when they tell, believe them first, do not scold, and take them to report and seek care

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Small
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: OrdinaryEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Children who took anti-sexual-abuse classes clearly did more self-protection moves in drills with a pretend stranger. What they learned was still there half a year later, and they did not become more fearful. Whether real abuse falls has not been measured. Among people who sexually abuse children, acquaintances make up a high share, so teach which places others must not touch, and that if touched or told to keep a secret, they come home and say so.

Cost

No money. A few words while bathing or changing clothes, then ask again now and then. The hard parts are parents being shy to name body parts, and when the child really speaks, holding back anger and not scolding them.

Benefit

Cochrane in 2015 pooled 24 trials of school anti-sexual-abuse classes, 5802 students aged 5 to 18. Most classes taught a few things: safety rules, the body belongs to you, which parts are private. They also taught which touches are not OK, which secrets must not be kept, and whom to tell. Many classes stressed that if something happens it is not the child’s fault. First, whether children protect themselves. Researchers had people pretend to be strangers and lure children — 2 trials, 102 people. Those who took the class did protective moves with OR 5.71 (95% CI 1.98–16.51, credible range), about 5.7 times those who did not. Converted from the original: about 390 of 1000 without the class managed it, about 795 with the class. Next, knowledge. 18 trials, 4657 people, questionnaire scores SMD 0.61 (0.45–0.78); 0.5 is medium. At half a year still 0.69 (0.51–0.87). 3 studies, 795 people, looked at harm: children’s anxiety and fear did not rise or fall (SMD −0.08, −0.22 to 0.07). 3 studies, 1788 people, looked at whether children disclose. Disclosing that they had been sexually abused OR 3.56 (1.13–11.24), from about 4 per 1000 to about 14. But children in the same class and school are alike; after correcting for that, the difference was no longer clear (OR 3.04, 0.75–12.33). Evidence quality for all outcomes was moderate. Authors state that whether these classes truly reduce sexual abuse needs long follow-up. UNESCO and five other UN agencies issued sexuality-education guidelines in 2018. They recommend teaching names of body parts, including genitals, from ages 5 to 8. They also teach which body parts are private. If someone touches them and they feel uncomfortable, say “no,” leave, then tell a trusted adult. The guidelines state sexual abuse is never the victim child’s fault — including when done by acquaintances, trusted people, or family. People’s Daily’s anti-sexual-abuse handbook gives a memorable line: places covered by a vest and shorts, others must not look at or touch. Article 16 of the Law on the Protection of Minors (未成年人保护法) requires parents to give children safety education and raise self-protection awareness and ability. Article 40 requires schools and kindergartens to run age-appropriate sexuality education. If schools or kindergartens find sexual assault or harassment, they must not conceal it and must report promptly to public security and education. In 2020 the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and eight other departments built a mandatory-reporting system. People who must report include staff at schools, kindergartens, hospitals, childcare, residents’ and villagers’ committees, hotels, and similar. If in their work they find a child has been or is suspected to have been harmed, they must report to public security at once. Situations to report include: suspected abnormal injury to genitals or private parts; a girl under 14 suspected of sexual assault, pregnancy, or abortion. The reporter’s identity is kept confidential. If reporting leads to a dispute, the reporter bears no legal liability. In 2025 procuratorates prosecuted 42,873 people for rape, child molestation, and other sexual crimes against minors, 5.5% fewer than the prior year. That was 58.9% of prosecuted crimes against minors. Of cases prosecuted that year against minors, 3852 had leads from mandatory reporting, 7.1%. A 2025 opinion from the Supreme People’s Court and 15 other departments says acquaintance offenders make up a high share in such cases. Some young children lack awareness, and guardians pay little attention, so a child may be sexually abused without knowing it (nationwide / multi-country)

Notes

Grade B because the numbers all come from school classes and measure knowledge and moves in drills, not how much real abuse fell. Parent teaching at home has no separate trial. Benefit is set small because there are only these substitute measures, not a figure for how many percent real abuse fell. Teach as above: use the real names of body parts, and say which are private. Also say that anyone who tells them to keep a secret and not tell mom or dad must be told about at home, and they will not be scolded for saying it. When the child speaks, treat it as true first — do not grill them on whether they made it up, and do not scold. The law requires teachers and doctors to report on “suspected”; parents need not wait until sure. Tell them it is not their fault, then dial 110. Before a forensic exam, do not bathe them or change their clothes — see Section 13, item 42 (after sexual assault). Who the other person is does not matter; relatives and teachers are still reported. Legal consequences when the other person is under 14 are in Section 9, item 18 (other person under 14). If a friend’s child tells you, tell their parents and report together. For a stranger’s child, dial 110 and leave it to police — do not go settle it yourself. The law states anyone may report to public security. The beneficiary is the child.

Sources
  1. Walsh K, Zwi K, Woolfenden S, Shlonsky A. (2015). School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), CD004380. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004380.pub3
  2. UNESCO, UNAIDS, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women, WHO (2018). International technical guidance on sexuality education: an evidence-informed approach (revised edition). https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/ITGSE.pdf
  3. 贵州省民政厅 (2024). 未成年人防性侵手册,请家长孩子查收!(转载人民日报). https://mzt.guizhou.gov.cn/xwzx/mzyw/202407/t20240723_85145012.html
  4. 全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法(第十一、十六、四十条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0
  5. 最高人民检察院等九部门 (2020). 关于建立侵害未成年人案件强制报告制度的意见(试行)(第二、三、四、十三、十五条). https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/wsfbt/202005/t20200529_463482.shtml
  6. 最高人民检察院 (2026). 未成年人检察工作白皮书(2025). https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/wsfbt/202606/t20260601_728630.shtml
  7. 贵州省民政厅 (2025). 最高法、最高检、民政部等16部门联合印发《关于依法从严惩处和防范性侵害未成年人违法犯罪的意见》(转载人民法院报). https://mzt.guizhou.gov.cn/xwzx/mzyw/202508/t20250807_88423354.html

30.20 Do not let a child under 12 ride a bicycle on the road, or under 16 ride an e-bike on the road: if they hit someone, parents pay; if they are hit, they may still bear a share

  • Money No cost
  • Time Hours
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Money
Value: HighEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

You must be 12 to ride a bicycle on the road, and 16 to ride an e-bike. A 14-year-old scanned their mother’s code for a shared e-bike, hit someone into grade-10 disability, and the court ordered the parents to pay about 187,000 yuan. An under-age child who is hit — even when the other side is fully at fault — has still been ordered by courts to bear a share.

Cost

No money, but you need another way to get to school — parent pickup, bus, or walking. The hard part is classmates all riding and the child pushing back.

Benefit

Article 72 of the Implementation Regulations of the Road Traffic Safety Law (道路交通安全法实施条例) says that on roads “driving a bicycle or tricycle requires full age 12.” The same article says “driving an electric bicycle or a motorized wheelchair for persons with disabilities requires full age 16.” Violation under Article 89 of the Road Traffic Safety Law (道路交通安全法) means a warning or a fine of 5 to 50 yuan; refusing the fine can mean the vehicle is seized. The fine is small; what matters is the bill after a crash. Article 1188 of the Civil Code (民法典) says when a minor causes harm to another, the guardian bears tort liability. If the child has their own property, pay from that first; any shortfall the guardian pays. Lianjiang County Court in Fujian decided one case. In May 2022, a child just turned 14 used the mother’s account to scan and rent a shared e-bike. They hit a person on an e-bike; the other side had grade-10 disability, and traffic police found the child fully at fault. The rental firm and insurer said the user agreement requires age 16 or above, so the child was not a lawful rider and they would not pay. The court ordered the child’s parents to pay about 187,000 yuan (exact figure 187017.83 yuan). Being hit while under age also costs. A Beijing judge wrote up a case: a 10-year-old riding a bicycle after school was hit by an e-bike into grade-10 disability; traffic police found the other side fully at fault. Article 1173 of the Civil Code says if the injured party was at fault for the harm, the tortfeasor’s liability may be reduced. On that basis the court found the child under 12 on the road and the guardian failing to stop it, and ordered the child’s side to bear a share of the loss. Injuries can also be worse. An Israeli trauma center admitted 337 children with traffic injuries from 2014 to 2016. Among those hurt on e-bikes, brain injury was 13%; on ordinary bikes, 3%. After other factors were included, the chance of more severe injury was about 2.6 times that of ordinary bikes (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.1–5.88, credible range) (nationwide / Fujian / Beijing / Israel)

Notes

Grade B because the statutes and both judgments were checked, but injury figures come from one hospital abroad, and no domestic age-broken casualty stats were found. The Lianjiang case is a reprint from a justice-bureau legal-education column; the judgment text was not found. Benefit is set large by the money measure using that case’s 187,000 yuan award — not every crash pays that much. Shared e-bike user agreements also require age 16 or above; do not give your account to a child to scan. Once of age, still wear a helmet — see Section 1, item 2 (wear a helmet and buckle it) and Section 22, item 12 (wear a helmet when mountain biking). Main beneficiaries are children; those who pay are the parents.

Sources
  1. 国务院 (2017 年修订). 道路交通安全法实施条例(第七十二条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8080816f3cbb3c016f40f566c10e23
  2. 全国人大常委会 (2021 年修正). 道路交通安全法(第八十九条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081817ab231eb017abd617ef70519
  3. 全国人大 (2020). 民法典(第一千一百七十三、一千一百八十八条). https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff808081729d1efe01729d50b5c500bf
  4. 广州市司法局 (2024-11-28). 14岁孩子骑共享电动车,竟把人撞致十级伤残……(转载央视网等). https://sfj.gz.gov.cn/ztlm/fzxc/yasf/content/post_9915896.html(网页存档 http://web.archive.org/web/20250421103222/https://sfj.gz.gov.cn/ztlm/fzxc/yasf/content/post_9915896.html)
  5. 秦鹏博 (2024-08-29). “半大孩子”怎样骑行才安全又合规. 北京政法网(来源京法网事). https://www.bj148.org/123/202408/t20240829_1667638.html
  6. Zmora O, Peleg K, Klein Y (2019). Pediatric electric bicycle injuries and comparison to other pediatric traffic injuries. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(5), 540-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1608361

30.21 If a child hits their head in sport and then has headache, dizziness, or fogginess, do not put them back in that day; if they keep vomiting, grow sleepier, or the headache keeps getting worse, go to emergency at once

  • Money No cost
  • Time Minutes
  • Willpower Some
  • Benefit Big
  • Measured in Lifespan
Value: HighEvidence B

For Child 3 to 18 at home

In plain terms

Children who keep playing after concussion take on average 44 days to recover; those taken out at once about 22 days. If something is off after a head hit, do not play again that day — wait until a doctor says yes. Repeated vomiting, growing sleepiness and not waking, headache getting worse, slurred speech, or seizures are signals to go to emergency at once.

Cost

No money. Take the child out; no more practice or competition that day. The hard part is a tight game, the child saying “I’m fine,” and coaches and parents wanting them back in.

Benefit

Concussion is a temporary disruption of brain function after a head hit; imaging usually shows nothing. A U.S. study followed 69 athletes with sport concussion, mean age about 15. The 35 taken out at once recovered in a mean 22.0 days. The 34 who kept playing with symptoms recovered in a mean 44.4 days (P=0.003; unlikely to be chance). Those who kept playing had 8.80 times the chance of recovery dragging past 21 days versus those taken out. A 2022 Amsterdam international sport-concussion meeting issued a consensus. It says loss of consciousness, seizures, unsteadiness, confusion, behavior change, or inability to remember events means immediate removal. Those people should not return to competition or training that day. The exception is when experienced medical staff check on the spot and confirm it is not from concussion. CDC guidance for parents and coaches is more direct: with suspected symptoms, leave at once, do not return that day, wait until a doctor says return is OK. It also says do not judge severity yourself — only medical staff can assess. It lists signals for emergency care at once: seizures; not recognizing people or places; repeated nausea and vomiting; odd behavior, growing confusion or agitation. Also growing sleepiness after passing out and not waking when called; slurred speech, weak or numb limbs. And headache that keeps getting worse without relief; unequal pupils or double vision (U.S. / multi-country)

Notes

Grade B because the keep-playing and leave groups were not assigned by lot, and numbers are small. Benefit is set large from recovery days roughly halved. The consensus also says less screen time for the first two days, light activity such as walking is OK, and after 24 to 48 hours increase slowly as tolerated. But sports with collision or fall risk wait until a doctor says yes. Helmets for cycling and skiing are in Section 22, item 12 (wear a helmet when mountain biking). Head bumps in elders that show problems only weeks later are in Section 13, item 10 (elder who hit their head). The beneficiary is the child.

Sources
  1. Elbin RJ, Sufrinko A, Schatz P, et al. (2016). Removal From Play After Concussion and Recovery Time. Pediatrics, 138(3), e20160910. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0910
  2. Patricios JS, Schneider KJ, Dvorak J, et al. (2023). Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport-Amsterdam, October 2022. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(11), 695-711. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-106898
  3. CDC (2025). Signs and Symptoms of Concussion. HEADS UP. https://www.cdc.gov/heads-up/signs-symptoms/index.html
  4. CDC. How to Respond. HEADS UP. https://www.cdc.gov/heads-up/response/index.html